Uplinger v. US Investigations Services

Fourth Circuit

Uplinger v. US Investigations Services

558 F. App'x 313

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 4, 2014

DocketNo. 13-2250

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 558 F. App'x 313 (Uplinger v. US Investigations Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Uplinger v. US Investigations Services, 558 F. App'x 313 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Pammalla Shannon Uplinger appeals the district court’s orders affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders granting judgment in favor of Defendants in her adversary proceeding and denying her motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Uplinger v. United States Investigations Servs., No. 1:13-cv-00417-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 13, 2013; entered Aug. 14, 2013). We deny Uplinger’s motions to supplement the record and for judicial notice. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Pammalla Shannon Uplinger appeals the district court’s orders affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders granting judgment in favor of Defendants in her adversary proceeding and denying her motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Uplinger v. United States Investigations Servs., No. 1:13-cv-00417-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 13, 2013; entered Aug. 14, 2013). We deny Uplinger’s motions to supplement the record and for judicial notice. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

558 F. App'x 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uplinger-v-us-investigations-services-ca4-2014.