Uplinger v. State
809 S.W.2d 479, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 744, 1991 WL 87568
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Virgil R. Uplinger, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record and find that an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Uplinger v. State, 809 S.W.2d 479, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 744, 1991 WL 87568 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).
809 S.W.2d 479 (Uplinger v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.