Uplinger v. Rees Broome, P.C.

475 F. App'x 28, 475 Fed. Appx. 28, 475 F. App’x 28, 2012 WL 3108619, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 16040
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 1, 2012
DocketNo. 12-1289
StatusPublished

This text of 475 F. App'x 28 (Uplinger v. Rees Broome, P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Uplinger v. Rees Broome, P.C., 475 F. App'x 28, 475 Fed. Appx. 28, 475 F. App’x 28, 2012 WL 3108619, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 16040 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

[29]*29Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Pammalla Shannon Uplinger appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting summary judgment for Defendant in her action filed pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692p (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Uplinger’s motions to take judicial notice and to supplement the record, we affirm for the reasons stated by the lower courts. Uplinger v. Rees Broome, P.C., Nos. 1:11-cv-01270-TSE-IDD; 09-13129-BFK; 10-01325-BFK (E.D.Va. Feb. 8, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
475 F. App'x 28, 475 Fed. Appx. 28, 475 F. App’x 28, 2012 WL 3108619, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 16040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uplinger-v-rees-broome-pc-ca4-2012.