Upham Manufacturing Co. v. Gibson & Warrington

Ohio Circuit Courts

Upham Manufacturing Co. v. Gibson & Warrington

18 Ohio C.C. 889

DecidedJanuary 15, 1898

StatusPublished

This text of 18 Ohio C.C. 889 (Upham Manufacturing Co. v. Gibson & Warrington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Upham Manufacturing Co. v. Gibson & Warrington, 18 Ohio C.C. 889 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Swing, J.

We see no reason to change the decision heretofore announced by us in this case as to striking the bill of exceptions from the files and therefoe affirming the judgment, as all the errors relied on arise out cf the bill of exceptions. The reocrd as corrected shows that the motion for a new trial was overruled July 22, instead of June 29. The bill of exceptions was signed and filed September 9, this was forty-nine days from the date of the overruling of the motion for a new trial.

The record recites, on the 9th of September: “Now comes

and presents this its bill of exceptions.” The law requires it to be presented to the judge at least five days before the expiration of the fifty days, and this our Supreme Court has held is jurisdictional,and that unless so presented,the judge loses jurisdiction tc sign the bill. This entry clearly shows that it was not presented until the forty-ninth day.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Swing, J.

We see no reason to change the decision heretofore announced by us in this case as to striking the bill of exceptions from the files and therefoe affirming the judgment, as all the errors relied on arise out cf the bill of exceptions. The reocrd as corrected shows that the motion for a new trial was overruled July 22, instead of June 29. The bill of exceptions was signed and filed September 9, this was forty-nine days from the date of the overruling of the motion for a new trial.

The record recites, on the 9th of September: “Now comes

and presents this its bill of exceptions.” The law requires it to be presented to the judge at least five days before the expiration of the fifty days, and this our Supreme Court has held is jurisdictional,and that unless so presented,the judge loses jurisdiction tc sign the bill. This entry clearly shows that it was not presented until the forty-ninth day.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 Ohio C.C. 889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/upham-manufacturing-co-v-gibson-warrington-ohiocirct-1898.