UpEquity SPV1, LLC v. Glennon
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
UPEQUITY, SPV1, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 8:24-cv-842-TPB-NHA
MEAGAN GLENNON,
Defendant. /
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This matter is before the Court on consideration of the report and recommendation of Natalie Hirt Adams, United States Magistrate Judge, entered on June 27, 2025. (Doc. 41). Judge Adams recommends that “Plaintiff, UpEquity SPV1, LLC’s Motion for Entitlement to Attorney’s Fees and Costs and Motion for Taxation of Costs” (Doc. 40) be granted. No party has objected, and the time to object has expired. After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). A district court must “make a de novo determination of those portions of the [report and recommendation] to which an objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). When no objection is filed, a court reviews the report and recommendation for clear error. Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006); Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404, 409 (5th Cir. 1982). Upon due consideration of the record, including Judge Adams’s report and recommendation, the Court adopts the report and recommendation. Consequently, Plaintiff's motion for entitlement to attorney’s fees and costs is granted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: (1) Judge Adams’s report and recommendation (Doc. 41) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED and INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE into this Order for all purposes, including appellate review. (2) “Plaintiff, UpEquity SPV1, LLC’s Motion for Entitlement to Attorney’s Fees and Costs and Motion for Taxation of Costs” (Doc. 40) is hereby GRANTED. (3) Plaintiff entitled to an award of attorney’s fees and costs. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file a supplemental motion on the amount to which it is entitled, as contemplated by Local Rule 7.01(c). DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida, this 1st day of August, 2025.
VAP. BAL. TOMBARBER =————(ai‘“‘C:;C;~*~™ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
UpEquity SPV1, LLC v. Glennon (UpEquity SPV1, LLC v. Glennon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.