Upchurch v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Upchurch v. State

477 S.W.3d 709, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1297, 2015 WL 8922998

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 15, 2015·No. No. ED 102617·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Artez Upchurch appeals from the judgment of the circuit court denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.085 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Artez Upchurch appeals from the judgment of the circuit court denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.085 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Upchurch v. State, 477 S.W.3d 709, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1297, 2015 WL 8922998 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

477 S.W.3d 709 (Upchurch v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.