Up-Right, Inc., a Corporation, and Wallace J. S. Johnson v. Patent Scaffolding Co., Inc., a Corporation

228 F.2d 102, 108 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 24, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 5409
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 2, 1955·No. 14617·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Up-Right, Inc. and Johnson appeal from a judgment of the district court denying appellants’ recovery for patent infringement on the ground that their patent is invalid. The question presented is whether appellants’ patented adjustable scaffold leg is a “combination” of old elements which produces a new *103 function and results, or only an “aggregation” of old elements each performing its well known function.

The judgment is affirmed on the grounds stated in District Judge Goodman’s memorandum decision, findings of fact and conclusions of law reported in 135 F.Supp. 813.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Up-Right, Inc., a Corporation, and Wallace J. S. Johnson v. Patent Scaffolding Co., Inc., a Corporation, 228 F.2d 102, 108 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 24, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 5409 (9th Cir. 1955).

228 F.2d 102 (Up-Right, Inc., a Corporation, and Wallace J. S. Johnson v. Patent Scaffolding Co., Inc., a Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Up-Right, Inc. v. Patent Scaffolding Co.
135 F. Supp. 813 (N.D. California, 1954)