Uonites v. American Rubber & Plastics Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Uonites v. American Rubber & Plastics Corp.

106 A.D.2d 876, 483 N.Y.S.2d 518, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21782

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 14, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 106 A.D.2d 876 (Uonites v. American Rubber & Plastics Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Uonites v. American Rubber & Plastics Corp., 106 A.D.2d 876, 483 N.Y.S.2d 518, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21782 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: Special Term erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Under subdivision 6 of section 241 of the Labor Law, “owners are responsible for a breach of the requirements of the statute irrespective of their control or supervision of the work site (Allen v Cloutier Constr. Co., 44 NY2d 290, 300)” (Lo France v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 89 AD2d 757, 758; see, also, DaBolt v Bethlehem [877]*877Steel Corp., 92 AD2d 70). There are issues of fact as to defendant’s negligence which preclude granting summary judgment (DaBolt v Bethlehem Steel Corp., supra; Brant v Republic Steel Corp., 91 AD2d 841). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kane, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Doerr, Green and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: Special Term erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Under subdivision 6 of section 241 of the Labor Law, “owners are responsible for a breach of the requirements of the statute irrespective of their control or supervision of the work site (Allen v Cloutier Constr. Co., 44 NY2d 290, 300)” (Lo France v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 89 AD2d 757, 758; see, also, DaBolt v Bethlehem [877]*877Steel Corp., 92 AD2d 70). There are issues of fact as to defendant’s negligence which preclude granting summary judgment (DaBolt v Bethlehem Steel Corp., supra; Brant v Republic Steel Corp., 91 AD2d 841). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kane, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Doerr, Green and Moule, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 A.D.2d 876, 483 N.Y.S.2d 518, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uonites-v-american-rubber-plastics-corp-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack