Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

• Court: Texas Attorney General Reports
• Decided: July 2, 1982
• Docket: MW-474
• Status: Published

Opinion

c ..

. *

The Attorney General of Texas Way 20, 1982

MARK WHITE Attorney General

Mr. Ernie W. Tullis opinion NO. MN-474 Supreme Court EuildlnO Administrator P. 0. BOX 12546 Texas Employment Commission Re: Proper method of financing Austin, TX. 7671% 2546 5121476-2501 101 East 15th Street unemployment benefits for T&x 9101674.1367 Austin, Texas 78778 former state employees Telecopier 51214750266 Dear Mr. Tullis: 1607 Main St.. Suite 1406 You inquire as to the proper method of financing unemployment Dallas. TX. 75201-4766 21417428944 insurance benefits for ex-state employees. You state that the Texas Employment Commission believes that funding beyond the original legislative appropriations for the Unemployment Compensation Benefit 4624 Alberta Ave.. Suite 160 Account for former state employees should come from funds collected by El Paso. TX. 79905-2793 915/5x?-3464 the comptroller from each state agency in reimbursement of unemployment benefits paid to the agency's ex-employees, a system of reimbursement contemplated by article V. section 55 of the current 1220 Dallas Ave.. Suite 202 appropriations act. On the other hand, you state that the comptroller Houston. TX. 27002.6666 has failed to place such reimbursements in the Unemployment 71316500666 Compensation Benefit Account and that he insists that any additional funding of this account should come from Fund No. 165. a Special 606 Btoadway. Suite 312 Administration Fund created by section 26 of the Texas Unemployment Lubbock. TX. 73461-3476 Compensation Act, codified as article 5221bL22a. V.T.C.S. [hereinafter 8061747-5238 these funds may be referred to as the "Benefit Account" and the "Administration Fund" respectively]. The Unemployment Compensation 4309 N. Tenth. Suite S Benefit A&count is established by the Texas Unemployment Compensation McAlle”, TX. 78501-1665 Act and designated by the commission as Fund No. 937. V.T.C.S. art. 5w662.4547 5221b-7. You advise that the situation causing this disagreement developed in 1981. 200 Main. Plaza, Suite 400 San Antonio, TX. 762052797 In order to determine the proper method of additional funding of 6l2l2254191 the Unemployment Compensation Benefit Account after' the regular legislative benefit appropriation for such account becomes insufficient, we must consider various provisions of the Texas An EqualOppcxlunftyl AffimWive Acifon Employer Unemploytint Compensation Act under which, in 1972, the state elected to cover for unemployment~insurance benefits all services ,performedin the employ of the state and to become a reimbursing employer. V.T.C.S. art. 5221b-22d.

The Un&ployment Compensation Fund is administered by the commission in payment of benefits as provided in the act, from the Unemployment Compensation Benefit Account. Actually, such benefits

p. 1663 .

Mr. Ernie W. Tullls - Page 2 (MW-474)

are not paid directly from this Benefit Account, but payments are made from this account to the Federal Trust Account in Washington, D.C.. in reimbursement of the Federal Trust Account of all payments made by it as benefits to former Texas state employees.

Article 5221b-22a establishes a special fund, separate and apart from all public moneys or funds of this state as an Unemployment Compensation Special Administration Fund. As amended in 1979. it now provides that the commission may use this fund to pay costs of administering the act. including costs of reimbursing the Benefit Account for unemployment compensation benefits paid to former state employees which are based on service for the .state. and the costs of construction and purchase of buildings and land necessary in such administration. Article 5221b-22a; as amended in 1979, further provides, among other things. that all interest and penalties collected under the provisions of the Texas Unemployment Compensation Act and all moneys now on deposit in the Unemployment Compensation Special Administration Fund shall be paid into the Unemployment Compensation Special Administration Fund established by that article. It also provides that the commission may, by resolution duly entered in its minutes, charge against said moneys any expenditures which it deems proper in the good administration of the act, provided the commission in such resolution finds that no other funds are available or can properly be used to finance such expenditures. .Apparently; the fund designated in this article from which all moneys on deposit therein were transferred is a state treasury special fund established theretofore under the Unemployment Compensation Act.

As already stated, the Special Administration Fund is created by section 26 of the Texas Unemployment Compensation Act, and denominated as Fund No. 165 by the commission. After the amendment of article 5221b-22a in 1979, the article no longer provided a continuous appropriation of .such funds as it did prior to amendment. However. a rider in the 1979 General Appropriations Act, provided that:

_ _ la111 monevs granted tothis state by the federal eovernment gor the administration of the Unemployment Compensation Act or which are now on deposit to the credit of any funds maintained by the state treasurer for the Texas Employment Commission and any moneys received for the credit of such funds are hereby appropriated for the purposes authorized by the... Texas Unemployment Compensation Act and/or for the purposes for which such moneys were granted. (Emphasis added).

Acts 1979. 66th Leg., ch..843, art. III, at 2632. A similarly worded rider appears on page 3403, chapter 875 of the General Appropriations

p. 1664 .. ,

Mr. Ernie W. Tullis - Page 3 (MW-474)

Act for fiscal years 1982-1983. Acts 1981, 67th Leg., ch. 875. art. I, at 3403.

Considering the foregoing statutes in conjunction with the provisions of the appropriations bills enacted by the Sixty-seventh Legislature, it seems clear that reimbursements of the payment of unemployment benefits for former state employees is authorized to be made from the Special Administration Fund No. 165 from the moneys appropriated by the legislature for such purpose by the aforementioned appropriations bill riders. Article 5221b-22a expressly provides such authority.

Further, a rider to the 1981 General Appropriations Act provides as follows:

a. At the close of each calendar quarter, the Texas Employment Commission shall prepare a statement reflecting the amount of unemployment benefits paid to all former State employees based on wages earned from State employment and present it to the Comptrolier of Public Accounts, who is hereby directed to pay by warrant out of funds appropriated from the General Revenue Fund such amount to the Unemployment Compensation Benefit Account to reimburse it for such payments.

The heads of State agencies, institutions, departments, commissions, boards, divisions, or other units of State government are directed to determine the proportionate amount of the reimbursement or payment due from funds'other than General Revenue Funds and to present the Comptroller of Public Accounts a purchase or transfer voucher requesting reimbursement from such funds to General Revenue, and shall reimburse the General Revenue Fund with a check for funds not in the State Treasury. Such transfers and payments as are authorized under law shall be made periodically. The Comptroller of Public Accounts -Y prescribe accounting procedures. and regulations to implement this section.

~b. An . agency. institution, department, commission, board. division or other unit of State government is authorized to allocate funds to a revolving account created on'its books to receive contributions from funds other than General Revenue based on a percentage-of-payroll assessment to be determined by such unit of

P- 1665 r Mr. Ernie W. Tullis - Page 4 (MW-4741

government for the purpose of reimbursing the General Revenue Fund for unemployment benefits paid.

Acts 1981, 67th Leg., ch. 875. art. V. 955 at 3820-21. See also Acts 1979. 66th Leg., ch. 843. art. V. 057 at 2922-23.

A state agency as an employer under the Texas Unemployment Compensation Act is liable under article 5221b-5a to the reimbursement provisions as is any other reimbursing employer. - Article 5221b-5b(c)(2) provides that upon notice by the commission of delinquency in payment of reimbursements by a governmental employer, the comptroller shall pay a sum to the commission in the amount of the 'delinquency from any funds which would otherwise be due from the state to the delinquent governmental employer. You do not advise as to whether any such'transfer of funds has occurred. The funds herein under consideration are funded periodically by appropriations from the state's general revenue and from the Federal Unemployment Trust Fund.~ You inform us that the lack of reimbursement of the Benefit Account from funds of the various ,participatingstate agencies results from the failure of the legislature to appropriate funds to individual agencies for such purpose. Cf. Acts 1981, 67th Leg., ch. 875, art. I, at 3403, 3406; Acts 1979. 66thLeg., ch. 843, art. III. at 2632. 2636 (specific appropriations to T.E.C. for Administration Fund).

The foregoing legislative actions created a system carefully designed to reimburse the expenditures of the Texas Employment Commission in paying unemployment benefits to which former state employees are entitled. Fund No. 937, the Unemployment Compensation Benefit Account, definitely appears to be the primary source from which benefit payments are to be made. This fund is designed to be replenished by periodically assessed reimbursements from the state agencies for ,the benefits received by their former employees. These reimbursements are to be collected by the comptroller and paid into such Benefit Account, which is under the general control of the Texas Employment Commission.

If this 'statutory system was fully implemented, this Benefit Account would seem to be self-sustaining with respect ,tdits funds for the purpose of paying benefits. In practice, however, .according to information submitted in connection with this opinion request. the Benefit Account is not self-sustaining, because no funds are appropriated to state agencies to use in reimbursing the expenditures of the Texas Employment Commission of sums paid into the Trust Fund in Washington, D.C., for benefits paid therefrom to their former employees. Reimbursements from these agencies would have to come from their funds which you state have already been appropriated for other state purposes. Consequently, as we are informed, the T.E.C. Benefit ~Account has been operating with a deficit the last few years due to

p. 1666 . .

. . Mr. Ernie W. Tullis - Page 5 (MW-474)

the lack of reimbursement from these agencies. This deficit appears to have been partially remedied during this time by periodic legislative appropriations to the Benefit Account from the state's general revenue and funds transferred from the supplementary fund, Special Administration Fund No. 165.

This Administration Fund is funded by interest and penalties collected from the employers for infractions of the Unemployment Compensation Act, article 5221b-1, et seq., V.T.C.S.. federal money grants and state general revenue appropriated by the legislature for payment of administrative expenses of the unemployment benefit program, ,including p yment of the benefits theniseives whenever *eC=.5Sary. See V.T.C.;. art. 5221b-22a. This supplementary function of the Administration Fund is further substantiated by the specific transfer appropriations by the legislature from this Administrative Fund to the Benefit Fund, General Appropriations Act, Acts 1981, Sixty-seventh Legislature, chapter 875, article I, at 3402, together with the generally worded appropriation of the balance of the Administration Fund for the purposes authorized by the Texas Unemployment Compensation Act. id. at 3403. and. more specifically, by the additional provision in article 5221b-22a that any expenditures from this Administrative Fund which the commission deems proper may be made upon a finding that no other funds.are available or can properly be used to finance .such expenditures. Under the prevailing circumstances concerning the status of the Benefit Account, there is nothing in the statutes to prevent the commission from resolving that the only funds now available to finance such benefit payments are those contained in the Administrative Fund. We caution, however, that any federal funds placed in Fund No. 165 may be used for the purposes authorized by article 5221b-22a. V.T.C.S.. only where the terms of the grant permit their use for those purposes. -Cf. 42 U.S.C.A. §1103(c)(l), (2) (certain federal funds transferred to state for payment of benefits may be used for administrative expenses only where appropriation specifies amount for administrative expense).

We conclude, therefore, that benefits to former state employees may properly be financed from either or both of such funds during the fiscal lives of the .1980-1981 Appropriations Bill and the current 1982-1983 Appropriations Bill, although the funds of the Administration Fund should be used to reimburse or supplement the Benefit Account only when the funds in that account are found by the commission to be insufficient for such purposes. In no instance is any state official involved authorized to draw, issue or honor for payment a warrant on any appropriation in the state treasury for any amount in excess of the amount then contained in such appropriated funds. Tex. Const. art..VIII, 56.

p. 1667 , - Mr. Ernie W. Tullis - Page 6 (MW-474)

S U M M A R-Y

Payments of unemployment benefits to former state employees entitled thereto are to be financed primarily from the Unemployment Compensation Benefit Account, designated as Fund NO. 937. When such fund is exhausted or insufficient, it may be replenished for such purpose secondarily from the Special Administrative Fund, designated as Fund No. 165. In such cases. both funds are.properly considered as being subject to the financing of benefit payments. No funds may be withdrawn from the state treasury in excess of the amount therein appropriated for the purposes for which the warrant is drawn.

kwn?w%&l

MARK WHITE Attorney General of Texas

JOHN W. FAINTER. JR. First Assistant Attorney General

RICHARD-E. GRAY III Executive Assistant Attorney General

Prepared by Robert L. Lattimore Assistant Attorney General

APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE

Susan L. Garrison, Chairman Jon Bible Rick Gilpin Patricia Einojosa Robert L. Lattimore Jim Moellinger

p. 1668