Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

CourtTexas Attorney General Reports
DecidedJuly 2, 1966
DocketC-793
StatusPublished

This text of Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion (Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, (Tex. 1966).

Opinion

NEP GENERAL

EXAS

Honorable Preston Smith Opinion No. C-793 Lieutenant Governor State of Texas Austin, Texas Re: Eligibility of FHA insured first lien mortgages as invest- ments ,forthe Per- manent University Fund of the University of Texas, and the author- ity of the Board of Re- gents of the University of Texas, the State Board of Education, the State Board of Trustees of the Employees Re- tirement System and the State Board of Trustees of the Teacher Retire- ment System to contract for the servlclng of FRA insured first lien Dear Governor Smith: mortgage Investments. You have requested reconsideration of Attorney General's Q$-&o~8o ww-484 (August 5, 1958), hereinafter referred to - . In that opinion, the Attorney General said the Permanent University Fund could not enter into contracts for servicing mortgages insured by the Federal Housing Administra- tion (FHA) because: "The first lien real estate mortgage securities Inquired about are not guaranteed in whole as required by Section lla of Article VII of the Constitution of Texas and are not eligible as an investment of the Permanent University Fund of the University of Texas."

-3804- .

2 Honorable Preston Smith, page 2 (C-793 )

Your request points to changes in the statutes and regulations pertaining to FHA Insured mortgages since WW-484 was rendered and closes with two questions that will be an- swered in order. "(1) ARE FHA INSURED FIRST LIEN REAL ESTATE MORTGAGES NOW ELIGIBLE AS AN INVESTMENT FOR THE PERMANENT D THE UNI- VERsTTY Ww-484 was limited to those mortgages insured by the FHA under Section 203 of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. Sec. 1709), as amended, hereinafter referred to as the Act; this opinion is also so limited. The basic question recited in WW-484 was whether or not such mortgages were "guaran- teed In whole" as required by Section lla of Article VII of'the'Constltution of Texas, the pertinent part of which provides that: "/?? -- The Permanent University Fund may be invested in first lien real estate mortgage securities guaranteed in any manner in whqle by:the United States Government or any agency thereof . . . . In making each and all of such investments said Board of Regents shallexer- cise the judgment and care under the clrcum- stances then prevliling which men of ordinary prudence, discrct$onand intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs not in regard to speculation but in regard to the permanent disposttion of their funds, consider- ing the probable income therefrom as well as the probable safety~of their capital . . . . This amendment shall be self-enacting . . . .' After consideration of the statutes and regulations in effect on August 5> 1958, the Attorney General concluded in W-484 that the FHA insurance was not sufficient to render the mortgages "guaranteed . . . in whole" for the benefit of the Permanen,tUniversity Fund. The Attorney General has always recognized the general effect of Section lla, Article VII of the Constitution of Texas. In Attorney General's Opinion No. m-263 (December 31, 1956), it was stated:

-3805- Honorable Preston Smith, page 3 (C-793 )

"A consideration of the provisions of. Article 7, Sections 10, 11, 11(a),,12 and 15 of the Constitution of Texas, shows quite clearly that the only change in our Consti- tution affected by the adoption of Article 7, Section 11(a) was to increase the permis- sive investments of the Permanent University Fund. The sole purpose of the endowment or non-expendable fund is to produce revenue to maintain the institution endowed, and the new provision of the Constitution is merely to aid in the procurement of that objective by the broadening of the investment port- folio." This statement was reiterated in Attorney General's Opinion No. W-69 (March 18, 1957). After careful consideration of amendments to the Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder, this office consents to reconsider 'che,conclusionin WW-484 that FJJA insured first lien mortgages are not eligible investments for the Permanent University Fund. The Act has been changed many times; therefore, for convenience all citations will be to the provisions of the Act as found in Title 12, U.S.C., Sections 1701 et. seq. In W-484, portions of Section 204 of the Act (12 U.S.C. Set . 1710) were quoted in order to outline the procedure re- quired when a mortgage has been foreclosed. Those portions will again be quoted with the relevant changes thereto em- phasized: "(a) I:nany case in which the mortgagee under a mortgage insured under section 1709 of this title flection 203 of the Act 7shall have foreclosed and-taken possession of ths mortgaged property in acecrdanse with regulations of, and within a period to be determined by, the Commissicnez~or shall, with the consent of the Commissfo.ner,have otherwise acquired such property from the mortgagor after default, the mortgagee shaX. be entitled to receive the benefit cf the insurance as hereinafter pro- vided, upon (1) the prompt conveyance to the Commissioner of title to the property which

-3806- Honorable Preston Smith, page 4 (C-793 )

meets the requirements of rules and regulations of the Commissioner in force at the time the mortgage was insured, and which is evidenced in the manner prescribed by such rules and regulations, and (2) the assignment to him of all claims of the mortgagee against the mort- gagor or others, arising out of the mortgage transaction or foreclosure proceedings, except such claims as may have been released with the consent of the Commissioner. Upon such conveyance and assignment . . . the Commissioner shall, subject to the cash adjustment hereln- after provided, issue to the mortgagee deben- tures having a total face value equal to the value of the mortgage and (subject to sub- section (e) (2) of this section) a certifi- cate of claim, as hereinafter provided. For the purposes of this subsection, the value of the mortgage shall be determined, in accord- ance with rules and regulations prescribed by the CommLssioner, by adding to the amount of the original principal obligation of the mortgage which was unpaid on the date of the institution of foreclosure proceedings, or on the date of the acquisition of the property after default other than by foreclosure the amount of all payments which have been made by the mortgagee for taxes, ground rents, and water rates, which are liens prior to the mort- gage, speciab assessments which are noted on the application for insurance or which become liens after the Wsurance of the mortgage,

- - insurance premiums, and any tax imposed by the United States upon any deed or other instrument by which said property was acquired by the mortgagee and transferred or conveyed to the Commissioner and by deducting from such total amount any amount received on

-3807- Honorable Preston Smith , page 5 (C-793 )

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

First Nat. Bank of Port Arthur v. City of Port Arthur
35 S.W.2d 258 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/untitled-texas-attorney-general-opinion-texag-1966.