Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
This text of Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion (Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Honorable H. H. Wellborn County Attorney Rusk County Henderson, Texas Opinion No. ww-856 Re: Que'stionsconcerning the collection of court costs In proceedings under the Texas Probate Code, in which a person is found to be of unsound mind . or .to be an habitual Dear Mr. Wellborn: drunkard. You have requested an opinion concerning certain ques- tions arising under Section 247 of the Texas Probate Code, which provides for the payment of costs in proceedings in which a person Is determined to be of unsound mind or to be an habitual drunkard. Section 247 is as follows: "When any person is found to be of unsound mind or to be an habitual drunkard, the cost of the proceeding shall be paid out of his estate, or, if his estate be insuf- ficient to pay the same, such costs shall be paid out of the county treasury, and the judg- ment of the court shall be accordingly. Acts 1955, 54th Leg., p. 88, ch. 55.” As we interpret your request, the following questions are raised: 1. Does Section 247 contemplate that before the costs of the proceeding are collected the court shall first determine whether the person declared to be of unsound mind or an habitual drunkard has an estate suf- ficient to pay such costs? 2. If it Is not necessary under the statute for the court to make such a determination before the costs are collected, then The Honorable H. H. Wellborn, page 2 (WW-856)
(a) If it abpears that the estate of the person who is the subject of the proceedings is not sufficient to pay the costs of the proceedings, is the county clerk to collect the costs from the county treasurer before issuing process? (b) If the county treasurer should pay the costs from the county treasury and it should later be determined by the Court that the estate is sufficient to pay such costs, should the treasurer seek reimburse- ment, and, if so, what would be the proper procedure for obtaining such reimbursement?
3. Whose duty is it to collect costs from an estate which has been sufficient to pay the costs of the proceedings? In answer to Question 1 above, it is our opinion that Section 247 contemplates that collection of court costs shall proceed only after the court has determin- ed whether the estate Is sufficient to pay the costs of the proceedings. In this connection It should be noted first that Section 247 is applicable only in a case where a person "is found to be of unsound mind or to be an habitual drunkard"; thus, the mere institu- tion of proceedings in which a person is alleged to be of unsound mind or to be an habitual drunkard is not sufficient to bring Section 247 into operation. It is required rather that the court have made a finding that the subject of the proceedings is of unsound mind or is an habitual drunkard. Section 247 does not require that such judgment ex- pressly reflect that a determination as to the insuf- ficiency of the estate to pay the costs has been made. It does, however, require that the judgment assess the costs on the basis of the estate's actual sufficiency or insufficiency, which In turn would make it necessary that the court arrive at a conclusion as to the condition of the estate before entering judgment. Inasmuch as the statute is not applicable until a person has been judicially found to be of unsound mind The Honorable H, H. Wellborn, page 3 (~~-856)
or an habitual drunkard, Questions 2 (a) and 2 (b) above, regarding collection of costs before issuing process or before a determination by the court as to the sufficiency of the estate to pay the costs, do not arise. Turning now to Question 3 above, it is our opinion that the collection of costs in a proceeding to which Section 247 is applicable, and in which the estate is sufficient to pay the costs, is to be carried out in the same manner as the collection of costs in other proceed- ings in the county court. Thus it is the duty of the clerk to tax the SUMMARY (1) It is the intention of Section 247 of the Texas Probate Code that before the costs of a proceeding to determine whether a person is of unsound mind or Is an habitual drunkard are collected, the Court shall have determined whether such person has an estate sufficient to pay such costs. (2) In the case of an estate which is suf- ficient to pay the costs, it is the duty of the County Clerk to tax the costs and if necessary to issue execution to collect them. Yours very truly, WILL WILSON Attorney General of Texas LH:ms The Honorable H. H. Wellborn, page 4 (W-856) APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE W. V. Geppert, Chairman W. 0. Shultz Martin DeStefano F. C. Jack Goodman William H. Pool, Jr. REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL By Leonard Passmore
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/untitled-texas-attorney-general-opinion-texag-1960.