Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports·Decided July 2, 1954·No. S-148·Published

Opinion

Modified and overruled December18.1954 in part by.Carrington v: Ra 85 s.Ct; 775

Non. Robert s. cahmrt opinion No. s-Ma Comptroller of Riblie Accounta Audia. Texas Re: Conatr~uction of coadtitutional amand,mnt kdopted November 2. 1954, ~coiIcerniqll votlly by Dew Mr. Calvert; member* of the aimed forcom.

You have requested an opinion relating to the constructIon ard effect of the cmstitutional amendment adopted November 2. 1954.~ amending Sections 1 and 2 and repealing Section Za-d Article VI, Con&f- tutfon of Texas, concerning voting by members of the armed forcei. Your questions ars am follows:

‘1. What i8 the affective date of tbe Constitutional Amendment voted upon a? th General Election on Novem- ber 2, 1954, which repeala Section 2a d Arttch VI and a- meads Sectioru 1 ad 2 of Article VI of tba Texas Conati- tution 7

“2. Doaa this amendment make any distinction be- tween morbbers bf tbe regular military establishment of the United Statea and officers or enlisted men of the Na- ttonal Guard of Texas, the National Guard Reserve, the Officers Reserve Corps of the United States. or draftees7

‘3. If your answer to the se$ond question is in the negative, will it be necessary for any member of the Armed Forces of the United States pr..component branches thereof, or in the military service of the United States, to pay his or her poll tax in the county in which he or she resided at the time of entering such service, so long as ha or she is a member of tha Armed Forces?

“4. Do you construe Section 2 to mean that a poll tan is lo&d only on persons batxveen the ages of 21 and 60; ani that the State poll tan levy will .still be $1.50, but .that members of the National Guard will still pay the State poll,tax of $1.00, as referred to in Articles 5840 end 58417.

A constitutional amendment becomes a part of the Constitu- tion oh the date of t&e official caxwaea shorting that the amendment re- ~d*sd a majority vote. Wilson V. state, 15 Tu. ct. App. 150 (1883); Ati’y.

L 4 . .: :: ;’ :‘, T h

Hon. Robert S. Calve&, page 2 (S-145)

Gan. Op. s-146 (1954). The votes of the elactlon held on November 2,1954, were canvaaaad on November 19, 1954, and the official canvas, ahowed that tha ame+mant had been adopted. It therefore became effective on Novem- bet 19. By ita express terms, Section 2 of Article VI is aelf-executing. The provisions amending Sectton 1 apd repaaling.Section 2a are likewi~ lelf-exeCuting.and become operative without further legislation. Att’y. ckn. Op. S-146, lupra. All statutes In conflict with these constitu~hal provisions are, mowsuperseded.

In answer to your mecopd question, the amendment doeN not make any dirtinction betaeen membera of the regular military establirh- meat of the United States and members of the National Guard, renervbtb. or drafteea. Revioualy, the members Ot the regular military establiah- mont were diafraacbiaed. while the othei groups tidre’not. Under the new lwndmo +t, tb pkvlslon in Secticm,l d’~ArticJe VI disqualifying memborm d tb regular military establishment ban bean omitted, and no peraw’ia ., now dlaqualifled aa, am elactor by reason cd hia military atatua. 2io~ever,~ .~ l p r q vla io n,h beon a a a+ded to Section 2 of Article VI which raadn:

. . . . Any mamber of the Armed Fooicw of the United Statea or component broachs tired, or in the military service of the United Statea, may vote only in the county in which he or she resided at the time of an- *to r iw lo lon(r aa he or ahe ia a member much ler vtc e of tha Armed Forcee.” ,,

B’ornwrly, National Guardsmen; roservlats, end dr&fteu la active lervicr could vote at the place of their legal residence at the timq of voting (pro- vidod they had realdUd within the State for one year and vi&in the county for ain montha) without regard to the place of residence at the tima’they -rod service. ~Activkmember~ of ti re lar eatebliahmant could not vote at all. Now, all these group= aro qua1r iod alactors It,they meet o&er roquirenunts, but no&a of them may vote anywhere in Texan ucept in the county whore they, resided when .they entered service. If a person in mlliy tary.service changes bia legal reaidenca to~some place other than U+cou#ity in Taua in which he resided :at.the time be ,enterad aorvico, he cannot vote ILthia state.

Throughout this opinion t&e term “rcaidenco’ meana legal reaidenco aa distinguished from actual residence.

The constitutional amendment does not change tha ruler f6r dekrrnintry wbat pkco ii the legal roaidanco, of the voter, nor doaa it rnaau that in all circumghncab a parson in military service Will ba eati- tlod td .&im a voting roaidence in the county of which he waa a roeideat at the tluia he entered aorvica. Place of rksidance ia still to be deter- - in the /ame way that it has always baen. Absence from the county or #tata for tha plrpoao of performing military servlee doea not of itself ‘oatrae a loaa’ob reridonce, but it ia possible for a person to abandon hia Hon. Robert 8. Calvwt, pege 3 (S-148)

old reaidence and acquire a aevj rorideace duriq time d service. Tar. Cwat. Art. XVI. Stc.c); Clark v. Stubba, 131S.W. Ld 663 (Tax. Civ. App. 1939); Struble v, Strublem W Ld 279 (Tax. Civ. App. 1943)7 Rtta- , 177 S W 2d 2k’(Tex. Civ. App. 1943); RobinsoiXXob- 2d 22g’(T;x. Civ. App. 1950); 15 Tax. Jpr. 715 II i iie a lo, uad thereby changta hia realdeuce to s&t?& ’ county, ho loses hia right to vote in this &ate while he continues in atrv- ice, .unleas ho re-•atabliahoa hia residence in the ctxmty in which he roaided when he enterod urvice. Furthor. 110ptrson who ontertd itrv- ice as a resident of another Star may acquire a voting resides8 in Toxaa whilt ht ia in rorvico.

It is our opinion that the restriction to voting in the county of residence at the time of entering service applies only to persons who art on extended active duty. timbers of the National Guards and restr- vtsts who art not on extended lctlvt strvict and retired military ptrson- nel art not l ubjoct to thim restriction. Further, “county of residence at the time of entering such serviet’ means the county in which tim person residod at the time he began his current active l orvice. To illustrate: A ptraon, while rtsiding in County A. joins one of the reserve components but dws not go into active service. He later moves to County B. After he has fulfilled the ltngth of residcnco requiremsnt. he may vote in Coun- ty B7 in fact, ho could vote nowhere tlat. Whtle living in County B. he is called into active service. During this time his place of voting is in Coun- ty B. the county in which he resided when he went into active service. Af- ttr his release from that tour of duty. he changes his residence to County C. His place of voting is in County C so long.as he continws to live thert. If he is again called into ective service while living in County C, that is the place where he will vote.

Your third qucstlon concorns the payment of the poll tax by persons in military service. They aro subject to paymant of a poll tan to the same extent and in tho samt axanne* as all other residoats of the State. Horotofore. by virtue of Sectian 28 of Article VI, qualifiad obetori in mil- itary service were not required to pay the poll tax as a coaditfbn precedent to voting during time of war ami for e certain period after its termination, but the recent amendment repealed this section of the Constitution. Hero- after, all persons in military service must pay a poll tax before February 1 in order to vote, unless they come within one of the exemptions. If they. are exempt under the general law. they must comply with the requirements relating to obtaining exemption certificates.

If a person is subject to the poll tan, he wee8 it in the county of his legal residence on the first day of January preceding its ltvy. L&n- v. B&our. 149 S.W. 795, SO5 (Ttx. Civ. App.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, (Tex. 1954).

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion (Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Linger v. Balfour
149 S.W. 795 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1912)