Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion: KP-0482

CourtTexas Attorney General Reports
DecidedFebruary 12, 2025
DocketKP-0482
StatusPublished

This text of Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion: KP-0482 (Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion: KP-0482) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion: KP-0482, (Tex. 2025).

Opinion

KEN PAXTON ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

February 12, 2025

The Honorable Daniel M. Gonzalez Dimmit County Attorney 103 North 5th Street Carrizo Springs, Texas 78834

Opinion No. KP-0482

Re: Authority of a county commissioners court to use county labor and equipment to open and close graves in private cemeteries (RQ-0541-KP)

Dear Mr. Gonzalez:

On behalf of the Dimmit County Commissioners Court (“Commissioners Court”), you ask several questions regarding the use of county labor and equipment to open and close graves in private cemeteries. 1 You tell us it has long been the practice of the commissioners “to assist the public in opening and closing gravesites in Dimmit County” (“County”). Request Letter at 2. You explain that, after advising the Commissioners Court you believe the current practice is prohibited by state law, the Commissioners Court posed several questions in an attempt “to find a way to continue to dig and open graves” in private cemeteries. Id.

Government Code chapter 791 does not authorize a county to enter an interlocal cooperation contract with a cemetery organization if the cemetery organization is not a governmental entity.

You first ask whether the Commissioners Court may “enter into an Interlocal Cooperation Contract or agreement with the local private cemetery organization[s] to assist them in digging and opening graves pursuant to Chapter 791 of the Texas Government Code.” Id. The purpose of chapter 791—the Interlocal Cooperation Act (“Act”) 2—is “to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of local governments by authorizing them to contract, to the greatest possible extent, with one another and with agencies of the state.” TEX. GOV’T CODE § 791.001. Specifically, the Act authorizes a local government to contract or agree with another local government or certain

1 See Letter from Hon. Daniel M. Gonzalez, Dimmit Cnty. Att’y, to Hon. Ken Paxton, Tex. Att’y Gen. at 2 (May 7, 2024), https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/request-files/request/2024/RQ0541KP.pdf (“Request Letter”). 2 See TEX. GOV’T CODE § 791.002 (providing that chapter 791 “may be cited as the Interlocal Cooperation Act”). The Honorable Daniel M. Gonzalez - Page 2

federally recognized Indian tribes to perform governmental functions and services. See id. § 791.011(a). The term “[l]ocal government” means a:

(A) county, municipality, special district, junior college district, or other political subdivision of this state or another state;

(B) local government corporation created under Subchapter D, Chapter 431, Transportation Code;

(C) political subdivision corporation created under Chapter 304, Local Government Code;

(D) local workforce development board created under Section 2308.253; or

(E) combination of two or more entities described by Paragraph (A), (B), (C), or (D).

Id. § 791.003(4). The term “[p]olitical subdivision” is defined to include “any corporate and political entity organized under state law.” Id. § 791.003(5); see also Dallas Area Rapid Transit v. Amalgamated Transit Union Loc. No. 1338, 273 S.W.3d 659, 661 n.13 (Tex. 2008) (acknowledging that political subdivisions as defined in subsection 791.003(5) are governmental entities). The Act also authorizes a local government that is a party to an interlocal agreement to contract with a state agency, as defined by section 771.002 of the Government Code, 3 or a similar agency in another state. TEX. GOV’T CODE § 791.011(b). A contract between a local government and an entity that is not another local government, an Indian tribe, or a state agency is not an interlocal cooperation contract authorized under Chapter 791 of the Government Code. 4 Your characterization of the cemetery organizations as “private” suggests they are not governmental entities with which the County may contract under the Act. 5 To the extent they are not, chapter 791 does not authorize the County to enter into an interlocal cooperation contract with them. 6

3 Section 771.002 defines the term “[a]gency” to include: (1) “a department, board, bureau, commission, court, office, authority, council, or institution of state government;” (2) “a state university or college, a junior college district, or any service or part of a state institution of higher education;” (3) a local workforce development board; and (4) certain statewide job or employment training programs for disadvantaged youth. TEX. GOV’T CODE § 771.002(1). 4 We note that a local government that is a party to an interlocal contract also may contract with certain organizations to supervise the performance of an interlocal contract. Id. § 791.013. Because you do not ask about the supervision of an interlocal contract, this authority is not relevant to your question. See generally Request Letter. 5 A cemetery organization can indeed be a private entity. See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE § 711.001(7) (defining “[c]emetery organization”). 6 As your second question is contingent on the ability of the County to enter into an agreement under the Act, we need not address it. See Request Letter at 2 (asking if the County “is able to enter into an Interlocal agreement, can they charge a nominal fee to the local private cemetery organizations or local funeral home for assisting in digging and opening graves”). The Honorable Daniel M. Gonzalez - Page 3

Health and Safety Code chapter 694 does not authorize a county to establish a burial program that extends beyond the disposition of the body of a deceased pauper.

You next ask whether the County has “authority under Chapter 694 of the Health and Safety Code to establish an Indigent Program or Pauper’s Burial Association to continue to open and close graves in Dimmit County, which are owned by private cemetery associations.” Request Letter at 2. Chapter 694 contains regulations governing the burial and disposal of dead bodies. See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE §§ 694.001‒.003. While it does not directly authorize an “Indigent Program” or a “Pauper’s Burial Association,” it does address the burial of a deceased pauper’s body. 7 Id. § 694.002(a). Subsection 694.002(a) provides that “[t]he commissioners court of each county shall provide for the disposition of the body of a deceased pauper.” 8 Id. (emphasis added). Subsection 694.002(e) expressly authorizes a county to use its resources for this purpose. Id. § 694.002(e) (authorizing a county to “create a fund to be used by the county to pay the costs incurred in disposing of the bodies of deceased paupers and administering the county’s body disposition activities”). The disposition of a deceased pauper’s body pursuant to subsection 694.002(a) may include the costs of burial, which could encompass the opening and closing of graves. See Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. JC-0228 (2000) at 2 (explaining that disposition costs include the costs of burial). In addition, a county may acquire, or accept as a donation, a burial plot located in a private cemetery for the disposition of the body of a deceased pauper. 9 See Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. Nos. GA-0235 (2004) at 4 (concluding a commissioners court has implied authority under subsection 694.002 to acquire land for the interment of deceased paupers), JC-0228 (2000) at 1 (concluding a county has authority under Local Government Code section 81.032 to receive donations toward the disposition of the body of a deceased pauper).

With that general discussion of chapter 694, we turn back to your specific question about County authority to “establish an Indigent Program or Pauper’s Burial Association to continue to

7 The term “pauper” is not defined in chapter 694. See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE §§ 694.001‒.003.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Willacy County v. Valley Baptist Hospital
29 S.W.2d 456 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion: KP-0482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/untitled-texas-attorney-general-opinion-kp-0482-texag-2025.