Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion: KP-0469

CourtTexas Attorney General Reports
DecidedJuly 3, 2024
DocketKP-0469
StatusPublished

This text of Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion: KP-0469 (Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion: KP-0469) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion: KP-0469, (Tex. 2024).

Opinion

July 3, 2024

The Honorable Charles Schwertner Chair, Senate Committee on Business & Commerce Texas State Senate Post Office Box 12068 Austin, Texas 78711-2068

Opinion No. KP-0470

Re: Whether low-THC cannabis inventory may be transported between department- approved locations by a licensed dispensing organization before a prescription is issued and filled under the Compassionate-Use Act (RQ-0525-KP)

Dear Senator Schwertner:

You ask whether the Texas Compassionate-Use Act (“Compassionate-Use Act”) and its associated regulations permit licensed dispensing organizations to “transport and store their low- THC cannabis inventory between” state-approved locations “before a prescription is issued and filled . . . .” 1

Legislative Background of Low-THC Cannabis for Medical Use

The Compassionate-Use Act was part of a legislative initiative in 2015 to permit a very limited medical use of low-THC cannabis in the State of Texas. See Act of May 19, 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., ch. 301, §§ 1–4, 2015 Tex. Gen. Laws 1419–25 (“Senate Bill 339” or the “Bill”). Senate Bill 339 did three main things. First, it added chapter 169 to the Occupations Code to authorize

1 Letter from Honorable Charles Schwertner, Chair, Senate Comm. on Bus. & Com., to Honorable Ken Paxton, Tex. Att’y Gen. at 1 (Dec. 15, 2023), https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/request- files/request/2023/RQ0525KP.pdf (“Request Letter”). You do not ask about the permissibility of this scenario under federal law and we do not address it except to note that federal laws may apply. Although the Compassionate-Use Act implicates only intrastate commerce, the United States Supreme Court has held that federal regulation of intrastate marihuana production and distribution does not violate the Commerce Clause. Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1 (2005) (concerning the California Compassionate Use Act). Additionally, although you ask whether dispensing organizations “may transport and store their low-THC cannabis inventory” as described, your letter focuses only on the transportation aspect. Request Letter at 1, 3 (emphasis added). As you do not otherwise provide context regarding the circumstances of the proposed transportation, we presume that the mention of storage merely illustrates a potential purpose of the transportation. See id. at 1–3. We limit our analysis accordingly. The Honorable Charles Schwertner - Page 2

qualified physicians to prescribe low-THC cannabis to patients with certain medical conditions. 2 Id. § 4 at 1423–25; see TEX. OCC. CODE §§ 169.001–.005; see also id. §§ 169.001(3) (defining “[l]ow-THC cannabis” as “the plant Cannabis sativa L., and any part of that plant . . . that contains not more than one percent by weight of tetrahydrocannabinols”), 169.003 (authorizing the prescription of low-THC cannabis). Second, the Bill added the Compassionate-Use Act in Health and Safety Code chapter 487, which directs the Department of Public Safety (the “Department”) to license and regulate the organizations that cultivate, process, and dispense low-THC cannabis to patients with a prescription. Bill § 1 at 1419–23; see TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE §§ 487.001– .256. The Bill also requires the Department to maintain a registry 3 to track information about each prescription. Bill § 1 at 1419–20. Third, the Bill amended the Texas Controlled Substances Act (“Controlled Substances Act”) to exempt licensed dispensing organizations from certain possession and delivery offenses and to specifically authorize them to possess low-THC cannabis. Id. §§ 2, 3 at 1422–23; see TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE §§ 481.111(e), .062(a)(6). With this background in mind, we address your question.

Transportation of Low-THC Cannabis under the Compassionate-Use Act and Associated Regulations

Your inquiry concerns the transportation of low-THC cannabis inventory by a licensed dispensing organization between state-approved locations before a prescription is issued and filled. 4 See Request Letter at 1, 3. As a general matter, a dispensing organization is “licensed by the [D]epartment to cultivate, process, and dispense low-THC cannabis” to a patient for whom it has been prescribed. TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE § 487.001(3) (defining “[d]ispensing organization”). The cultivation, processing, and dispensation of low-THC cannabis takes place at a licensed dispensing organization’s premises. See id. § 487.102(1)(B)(ii) (requiring a dispensing organization to possess “the ability to secure . . . premises” to be eligible for a license); see also 37 TEX. ADMIN. CODE §§ 12.1(12) (2017) (Tex. Dep’t of Pub. Safety, Definitions) (defining “[r]egulated premises” as “[t]he physical areas under the control of a licensee, in which low-THC cannabis, or production related raw materials or by-products, are cultivated, handled, transported, processed, or dispensed”), 12.2(a) (2017) (Tex. Dep’t of Pub. Safety, Requirements and Standards) (providing that “[a] licensee may only perform regulated functions at a department approved location”).

The statute’s use of the word “premises” does not foreclose the possibility that a dispensing organization may have multiple premises. See Smith v. State, 268 S.W. 742, 743 (Tex. Crim. App. 1925) (observing that “[t]he word ‘premises’ has many varied meanings” and could mean, for

The Bill initially authorized only the treatment of intractable epilepsy, but the law has since been amended 2

and now includes nine specified illnesses, plus “a medical condition that is approved for a research program under Subchapter F, Chapter 487, Health and Safety Code[.]” TEX. OCC. CODE § 169.003(3)(A). 3 The Compassionate-Use Act requires the Department to establish and maintain an online “compassionate- use registry” containing information about the prescribing physician, the patient, the dosage prescribed, the total amount of low-THC cannabis required to fill the prescription, and “a record of each amount of low-THC cannabis dispensed by a dispensing organization to a patient under a prescription.” TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE § 487.054(a). 4 Because you reference “a licensed dispensing organization operating out of multiple facilities within the State,” we understand you to ask about transportation between the multiple facilities operated by the same licensee. Request Letter at 3. The Honorable Charles Schwertner - Page 3

example, “different bodies of land separated from each other” as readily as it could mean “all of a large estate”); see also 37 TEX. ADMIN. CODE § 12.11(b)(7)(B)(i) (2017) (Tex. Dep’t of Pub. Safety, Application for License) (requiring an applicant to describe “all properties applicant proposes to utilize to cultivate, process, and dispense low-THC cannabis” (emphasis added)). Although the Compassionate-Use Act authorizes the dispensing of low-THC cannabis in accordance with the law and associated regulations, as you acknowledge, it does not address the transportation of low-THC cannabis, whether between Department-approved locations or otherwise. See Request Letter at 3 (observing that no provision in that law of which you are aware either expressly provides for or prohibits the transportation of low-THC inventory “from one facility to another within the state”). The statute does, however, direct the public safety director of the Department to “adopt any rules necessary for the administration and enforcement of [chapter 487]” (“Department rules”). TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE § 487.052.

The Department has promulgated multiple rules that contemplate the transportation of low- THC cannabis. See, e.g., 37 TEX. ADMIN. CODE §§ 12.11(b)(7)(D)(iv) (2017) (Tex. Dep’t of Pub.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gonzales v. Raich
545 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 2005)
Railroad Com'n of Texas v. Lone Star Gas Co.
844 S.W.2d 679 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)
Smith v. State
268 S.W. 742 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion: KP-0469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/untitled-texas-attorney-general-opinion-kp-0469-texag-2024.