Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports·Decided April 12, 1996·No. 95-910·Published

Opinion

TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

State of California

DANIEL E. LUNGREN

Attorney General

______________________________________

OPINION : : No. 95-910 of : : April 12, 1996 DANIEL E. LUNGREN :

Attorney General :

:

CLAYTON P. ROCHE :

Deputy Attorney General :

:

______________________________________________________________________________

THE HONORABLE CURT PRINGLE, SPEAKER OF THE CALIFORNIA ASSEMBLY, has requested an opinion on the following questions:

1. May the State Superintendent of Public Instruction waive provisions of the Education Code for entire school districts, except those relating to earthquake safety?

2. May the State Superintendent of Public Instruction allocate funds to a school district for the operation of alternative schools on a basis (e.g., "active monthly enrollment" or "block grants" for special purpose education programs) for which no statutory authority exists?

3. May the State Superintendent of Public Instruction designate an entire school district as an "alternative school"?

4. What is the role of the State Board of Education in the waiver of Education Code provisions by the State Superintendent of Public Instruction for the operation of alternative schools?

1. 95-910

CONCLUSIONS

1. The State Superintendent of Public Instruction may not waive provisions of the Education Code for entire school districts.

2. The State Superintendent of Public Instruction may not allocate funds to a school district for the operation of alternative schools on a basis (e.g., "active monthly enrollment" or "block grants" for special purpose education programs) for which no statutory authority exists.

3. The State Superintendent of Public Instruction may not designate an entire school district as an "alternative school."

4. The State Board of Education has no role in the waiver of Education Code provisions by the State Superintendent of Public Instruction for the operation of alternative schools.

ANALYSIS

The State Superintendent of Public Instruction ("Superintendent") is "elected by the qualified electors of the State at each gubernatorial election." (Cal. Const., art. IX, ' 2.) The Superintendent is directed to "[s]uperintend the schools of this state" (Ed. Code, ' 33112) 1 and "execute, under direction of the State Board of Education, the policies which have been decided upon by the board" (' 33111). The Superintendent is ex-officio the director and executive officer of the State Department of Education. ('' 33301-33303.)

We are presented herein with a number of questions relating to the authority of the Superintendent to waive provisions of the Education Code with respect to the operation of "alternative schools" by local school districts.

1. Authority To Waive Statutory Requirements

The first question presented is whether the Superintendent has the authority to waive provisions of the Education Code for entire school districts, except those provisions relating to earthquake safety. For example, may the Superintendent waive provisions relating to (1) the definition of "average daily attendance" for purposes of computing school apportionments (' 46000 et seq.), (2) the determination of revenue limit apportionment funding (' 42238 et seq.), (3) the requirements to maintain specified minimum amounts of instructional time for the school day and year (' 46206), or (4) the determination of apportionments for various special purpose ("categorical") education programs? We conclude that the Superintendent may not waive statutory requirements for entire school districts.

In 1975 (Stats. 1975, ch. 448) the Legislature authorized the establishment of alternative schools by local districts. The purposes of this statutory scheme ('' 58500-58512) are set forth in section 58500 as follows:

1 All section references are to the Education Code unless otherwise indicated.

2. 95-910

"The governing board of any school district may establish and maintain one or more alternative schools within the district.

"For the purposes of this article, an alternative school is defined as a school or separate class group within a school which is operated in a manner designed to:

"(a) Maximize the opportunity for students to develop the positive values of self-reliance, initiative, kindness, spontaneity, resourcefulness, courage, creativity, responsibility, and joy.

"(b) Recognize that the best learning takes place when the student learns because of his desire to learn.

"(c) Maintain a learning situation maximizing student self-motivation and encouraging the student in his own time to follow his own interests. These interests may be conceived by him totally and independently or may result in whole or in part from a presentation by his teachers of choices of learning projects.

"(d) Maximize the opportunity for teachers, parents and students to cooperatively develop the learning process and its subject matter. This opportunity shall be a continuous, permanent process.

"(e) Maximize the opportunity for the students, teachers, and parents to continuously react to the changing world, including but not limited to the community in which the school is located."

Parents or guardians may request the governing board of their school district to establish an alternative school program. (' 58502.) "Teachers employed and students enrolled in the alternative school shall be selected entirely from volunteers." (' 58503.) Alternative schools may be established "in each attendance area or on a districtwide basis, with enrollment open to all students districtwide, or any combination thereof." (' 58505.) These schools must be evaluated annually by the school district and a report sent to the Superintendent. (' 58510.) The Superintendent is also authorized to establish further minimum standards and guidelines for the operation of alternative schools. (' 58511.)

There is no general authority for the Superintendent to waive provisions of the Education Code for entire school districts. However, with respect to the operation of alternative schools by local districts, the Superintendent may waive provisions of the Education Code, except those relating to earthquake safety and those specifically relating to alternative schools. Section 58509, the focus of this opinion, provides:

"For the operation of alternative schools as herein defined, the Superintendent of Public Instruction may, upon application of a school district, waive any provisions of this code other than those relating to earthquake safety and the provisions of this chapter [sections 58500-58512]."

3. 95-910

In applying the language of section 58509 to the issues raised herein, we are guided by well established principles of statutory construction. "When interpreting a statute our primary task is to determine the Legislature's intent. [Citation.]" (Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. Orange County Employees Retirement System (1993) 6 Cal.4th 821, 826.) "To determine the intent of legislation, we first consult the words themselves, giving them their usual and ordinary meaning. [Citations.]" (DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 593, 601.) When "`statutory language is . . . clear and unambiguous there is no need for construction, and courts should not indulge in it.'" (Rojo v. Kliger (1990) 52 Cal.3d 65, 73.) The plain meaning of words in a statute may be disregarded only when that meaning is "`repugnant to the general purview of the act,' or for some other compelling reason. . . ." (Tiernan v. Trustees of Cal. State University & Colleges (1982) 33 Cal.3d 211, 219.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, (Cal. 1996).

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion (Untitled California Attorney General Opinion) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wells Fargo Bank v. Superior Court
811 P.2d 1025 (California Supreme Court, 1991)
Clean Air Constituency v. California State Air Resources Board
523 P.2d 617 (California Supreme Court, 1974)
DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.
828 P.2d 140 (California Supreme Court, 1992)
Tiernan v. Trustees of California State University and Colleges
655 P.2d 317 (California Supreme Court, 1982)
Bear River Sand & Gravel Corp. v. County of Placer
258 P.2d 543 (California Court of Appeal, 1953)
Rojo v. Kliger
801 P.2d 373 (California Supreme Court, 1990)
Comité De Padres De Familia v. Honig
192 Cal. App. 3d 528 (California Court of Appeal, 1987)
Salazar v. Eastin
890 P.2d 43 (California Supreme Court, 1995)