Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

CourtCalifornia Attorney General Reports
DecidedJanuary 3, 1991
Docket90-305
StatusPublished

This text of Untitled California Attorney General Opinion (Untitled California Attorney General Opinion) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, (Cal. 1991).

Opinion

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

State of California

JOHN K. VAN DE KAMP

Attorney General

______________________________________

OPINION :

: No. 90-305

of :

: January 3, 1991

JOHN K. VAN DE KAMP :

Attorney General :

:

RONALD M. WEISKOPF :

Deputy Attorney General :

___________________________________________________________________ _____________

THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION has requested

an opinion on the following question:

Does Health and Safety Code section 18941.5, subdivision

(a), apply the building standards as they appear in the model codes

that are named in that subdivision, or as they have been amended and

appear in the California Building Standards Code, to all occupancies

throughout the state?

CONCLUSION

Health and Safety Code section 18941.5, subdivision (a),

applies the building standards of the model codes named in the

subdivision as they have been amended and appear in the California

Building Standards Code to all occupancies throughout the state.

ANALYSIS

The State Building Standards Code (Tit. 24, Cal. Code

Regs.) is a composite of building standards of three different

backgrounds: some have been adopted directly by state agencies

without change from building standards contained in various model

industry codes; some have been adapted from the model codes'

standards to meet California conditions; and some constitute

extensive additions to the model codes that have been adopted to

address particular California concerns.

1. 90-305

Section 18941, subdivision (a), of the Health and Safety

Code1/ makes certain building standards applicable to all occupancies

throughout California. The subdivision provides as follows:

"The building standards contained in the Uniform Fire

Code of the International Conference of Building Officials

and the Western Fire Chiefs Association, Inc., the Uniform

Building Code of the International Conference of Building

Officials, the Uniform Plumbing Code of the International

Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, the

National Electrical Code of the National Fire Protection

Association, the Uniform Mechanical Code of the

International Conference of Building Officials and the

International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical

Officials as referenced in the State Building Standards

Code shall apply to all occupancies throughout the state

and shall become effective 180 days after publication in

the State Building Standards Code by the State Building

Standards Commission or at a later date after publication

established by the commission."

The question presented asks which are the building standards that the

subdivision makes applicable to all occupancies throughout the state:

those that are contained in the uniform model codes themselves as

adopted by the various private organizations, or those that have been

adapted by state agencies, through additions and deletions to those

found in the model codes, and are published in the State Building

Standards Code. We conclude they are the latter.2/

1. Unidentified section references hereinafter refer to

sections of the Health and Safety Code. Also, all references to

the State Building Code, the State Building Standards Code, and

Title 24 of the California Administrative Code, mean the California

Building Standards Code. (§ 18902.)

2. Although subdivision (a) of section 19841.5 provides that

the building standards to which it refers are to be applicable to

all occupancies throughout the state, subdivisions (b) and (c) of

the section recognize that cities and counties might modify them

under certain circumstances. With respect to that authority, we

were also asked whether cities and counties have authority to amend

the building standards required by section 18941.5, subdivision

(a), and if so, if those amendments had to be based on local

climatic, geological, or topographical conditions. Subsequent to

entertaining the request, we were informed that the question of the

scope of local authority under section 18941.5 is an issue in

pending litigation in both federal and state court. This office

"has traditionally declined to provide opinions on such questions

while the litigation is pending." (66 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. i, iv

[Foreword] (1983).)

2. 90-305

In answering the question our primary task is to ascertain

the intention of the Legislature for enacting subdivision (a) of

section 18941.5 so that we may interpret it in such a way as to

further that intent. (Cf., Sand v. Superior Court (1983) 34 Cal.3d

567, 570; Great Lakes Properties, Inc v. City of El Segundo (1977) 19

Cal.3d 152, 153.) To do so we look to the words of the subdivision

itself (People v. Belleci (1979) 24 Cal.3d 879, 884; Moyer v.

Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd. (1973) 10 Cal.3d 222, 230), "according

significance, if possible, to every word, phrase and sentence in

pursuance of the legislative purpose." ( Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair

Employment & Housing Comm. (1987) 43 Cal.3d 1379, 1387). "A statute

must be construed 'in the context of the entire statutory scheme of

which it is a part, in order to achieve harmony among the parts.'"

(People v. Woodhead (1987) 43 Cal.3d 1002, 1009.)

The State Building Standards Law (§ 18901 et seq.) requires

state agencies responsible for the adoption of building standards to

submit them to the State Building Standards Commission for review and

approval (§§ 18929, 18930, 18931 subds. (a),(c)), after which they

are codified into the State Building Standards Code (§§ 18931, subd.

(b), 19839, 18940; cf. §§ 18910, 18911). The standards adopted by

the agencies are based in the main on standards contained in

"uniform" or "model" industry codes, which are developed by private

organizations through a consensual process among product

manufacturers, building industry representatives, and government

building officials to govern various aspects of building construction

within the industry's concern. (§§ 18930, subd. (a)(7); 18932, subd.

(c); 18941; cf. §§ 18916; 18928, 18939; see Danville Fire Protection

Dist. v. Duffel Financial & Constr. Co. (1976) 58 Cal.App.3d 241,

249; 65 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 397, 399, 401 (1982); 63 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen.

566, 568-570 (1980); 60 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 234, 237 (1977).)3/

But state agencies do not necessarily adopt building

standards contained in the model codes without change; to the

contrary, they are authorized and expected to amend them, with

appropriate additions or deletions, in order to tailor them to

particular California conditions and to address particular California

programs, interests, and public health and safety concerns. (Cf. §§

3. These would include, for example, the Uniform Housing Code

and the Uniform Building Code of the International Conference of

Building Officials, the Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform

Mechanical Code of the International Association of Plumbers and

Mechanical Officials, the National Electrical Code of the National

Fire Protection Association, and the Uniform Fire Code of the

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Woodhead
741 P.2d 154 (California Supreme Court, 1987)
City and County of San Francisco v. Farrell
648 P.2d 935 (California Supreme Court, 1982)
People v. Belleci
598 P.2d 473 (California Supreme Court, 1979)
California Manufacturers Ass'n v. Public Utilities Commission
598 P.2d 836 (California Supreme Court, 1979)
Rosemary Properties, Inc. v. McColgan
177 P.2d 757 (California Supreme Court, 1947)
Great Lakes Properties, Inc. v. City of El Segundo
561 P.2d 244 (California Supreme Court, 1977)
Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board
514 P.2d 1224 (California Supreme Court, 1973)
Diachenko v. State of California
123 Cal. App. 3d 932 (California Court of Appeal, 1981)
Danville Fire Protection District v. Duffel Financial & Construction Co.
58 Cal. App. 3d 241 (California Court of Appeal, 1976)
Watkins v. Real Estate Commissioner
182 Cal. App. 2d 397 (California Court of Appeal, 1960)
Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing Commission
743 P.2d 1323 (California Supreme Court, 1987)
Stillwell v. State Bar
173 P.2d 313 (California Supreme Court, 1946)
Sand v. Superior Court
668 P.2d 787 (California Supreme Court, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/untitled-california-attorney-general-opinion-calag-1991.