Unterberg v. Therm-Air Mfg. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Unterberg v. Therm-Air Mfg. Co.

200 N.E.2d 635, 14 N.Y.2d 859, 251 N.Y.S.2d 970, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1058

DecidedJune 10, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 200 N.E.2d 635 (Unterberg v. Therm-Air Mfg. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Unterberg v. Therm-Air Mfg. Co., 200 N.E.2d 635, 14 N.Y.2d 859, 251 N.Y.S.2d 970, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1058 (N.Y. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, and matter remitted to the Supreme Court for the entry of judgment in favor of plaintiffs for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division.

Concur: Judges Dye, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan. Chief Judge Desmond and Judge Fuld dissent and vote to affirm for the reasons stated in the majority opinion at the Appellate Division.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, and matter remitted to the Supreme Court for the entry of judgment in favor of plaintiffs for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division.

Concur: Judges Dye, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan. Chief Judge Desmond and Judge Fuld dissent and vote to affirm for the reasons stated in the majority opinion at the Appellate Division.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 N.E.2d 635, 14 N.Y.2d 859, 251 N.Y.S.2d 970, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1058, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/unterberg-v-therm-air-mfg-co-ny-1964.