Unruh v. Lukens

31 A. 110, 166 Pa. 324, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1204
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 4, 1895
DocketAppeal, No. 209
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 31 A. 110 (Unruh v. Lukens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Unruh v. Lukens, 31 A. 110, 166 Pa. 324, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1204 (Pa. 1895).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The controlling facts of this case are sufficiently presented [332]*332in the pleadings and report of the learned master which was approved by the court below. Our examination of the record has satisfied us that there is no substantial error either in the findings of fact, or in the legal conclusions of which the decree is predicated. There appears to be nothing in either of the specifications of error that requires special notice. The questions involved are sufficiently considered in the master’s report, and for reasons there given we think the decree should be affirmed. There appears to be no reason for imposing any part of the costs on the appellee.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hahn Estate
167 A.2d 151 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1961)
Trenouth v. Mulroney
227 P.2d 590 (Montana Supreme Court, 1951)
Matthaei v. Pownall
84 A. 444 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1912)
Sears v. Scranton Trust Co.
77 A. 423 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1910)
Peterson v. Budge
102 P. 211 (Utah Supreme Court, 1909)
Viallet v. Consolidated Ry. & Power Co.
84 P. 496 (Utah Supreme Court, 1906)
Estate of Coleman
44 A. 1085 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 A. 110, 166 Pa. 324, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/unruh-v-lukens-pa-1895.