Home/Court of Appeals of Texas/Unocal Pipeline Company v. BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc., Conoco Phillips Transportation Alaska, Inc., and Exonmobile Pipeline Co.

Unocal Pipeline Company v. BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc., Conoco Phillips Transportation Alaska, Inc., and Exonmobile Pipeline Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 17, 2015·No. 01-15-00266-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTIONS

Cause number: 01-15-00266-CV Style: Unocal Pipeline Co. v. BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc., ConocoPhillips Transportation Alaska, Inc. and ExxonMobil Pipeline Co. Date motions filed*: September 15, 2015 Type of motions: Unopposed Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Steven G. Reed and Lara E. Romansic; Motions of Resident Attorney Michael V. Powell in Support of Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Steven G. Reed and Lara E. Romansic Parties filing motions: Appellees BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc., ConocoPhillips Transportation Alaska, Inc., and ExxonMobil Pipeline Co. Document to be filed: N/A

Is appeal accelerated? No.

Ordered that motions are:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due: N/A  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________

Judge's signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes  Acting for the Court

Date: September 17, 2015

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unocal Pipeline Company v. BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc., Conoco Phillips Transportation Alaska, Inc., and Exonmobile Pipeline Co., (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Unocal Pipeline Company v. BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc., Conoco Phillips Transportation Alaska, Inc., and Exonmobile Pipeline Co. (Unocal Pipeline Company v. BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc., Conoco Phillips Transportation Alaska, Inc., and Exonmobile Pipeline Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.