Unknown Heirs of Bowles v. Rouse
This text of 8 Ill. 408 (Unknown Heirs of Bowles v. Rouse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is necessary that a person, either natural or articial, should prosecute a writ of error. There must be some definite person as plaintiff in error, against whom a judgment may be given.for costs in case the judgment b.elow should be affirmed. Leave is, however, given to amend the writ of error, whifch, if not done within ten days, the writ of error will be dismissed.
The motion to dismiss because a writ of error will not lie, is overruled.
Motion overruled.
On the decision of this motion, the counsel, for the plaintiffs entered the appearance of Bobert L. Catherwood and Ellen Catherwood, his wife, as plaintiffs in this case.-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Ill. 408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/unknown-heirs-of-bowles-v-rouse-ill-1846.