University of Washington v. United States Department of Homeland Security

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided November 30, 2023·No. 2:22-cv-01329·Unknown

Opinion

1 District Judge Tana Lin

7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT AT SEATTLE 9 THE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, a Case No. 2:22-cv-01329-TL 10 Washington State Agency; THE CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 11 WASHINGTON, a research center created by state EXTENSION OF TIME law; and ANGELA GODOY, Director of the 12 Center for Human Rights at the University of Noted For Consideration: Washington, November 30, 2023 13 Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 16 HOMELAND SECURITY; and UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS

18 Defendants.

19 The parties make the following stipulation and move to extend the trial date and related 20 deadlines. 21 A court may modify a deadline for good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b). Continuing pretrial 22 and trial dates is within the discretion of the trial judge. See King v. State of California, 23 784 F.2d 910, 912 (9th Cir. 1986). 24 1 The parties submit there is good cause for an extension of the deadline. Since the last 2 extension, ICE has produced additional information and the parties have exchanged proposals in 3 good faith on one remaining request. The parties are continuing to narrow the issues and remain 4 hopeful that the matter can be resolved without briefing on the merits. The parties want to work

5 through the few remaining issues expeditiously with using as little Court resources as possible. 6 Counsel have conferred and the parties jointly request that the below dates be extended 7 based on the parties’ continuing efforts to date. The parties both agree that additional time is 8 necessary in order to properly work through the issues in this case and resolve it without the 9 need for motion practice or at least minimizing the number of issues that need to be brought to 10 the Court’s attention. Continuing the existing deadlines for a limited time will allow the parties 11 to efficiently address all issues for the Court’s review. 12 The parties propose the following deadlines: 13 Deadline Current Date Extended Date 14 Discovery Cutoff November 30, 2023 January 29, 2024 15 Dispositive Motions January 5, 2024 March 5, 2024 16 17 DATED this 30th day of November, 2023 18 // 19 // 20 21 22 23 24 1 DAVIS, WRIGHT, TREMAINE, LLP TESSA GORMAN 2 Special Assistant Attorneys General Acting United States Attorney

3 s/ Nickolas Bohl s/ Daniel A. Fiedler NICKOLAS BOHL WSBA #48978 4 DANIEL A. FIEDLER, WSBA #56436 Assistant United States Attorney 920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300 United States Attorney’s Office 5 Seattle, WA 98104-1610 700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220 Phone: 206-622-3150 Seattle, Washington 98101-1271 6 Fax: 206-757-7700 Phone: 206-553-7970 Email: danielfiedler@dwt.com Fax: 206-553-4067 7 Email: nickolas.bohl@usdoj.gov Thomas R. Burke, Pro Hac Vice 8 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800 Counsel for Defendants San Francisco, CA 94111-6533 9 Phone: 415-276-6552 I certify that this memorandum contains 248 Fax: 415-276-6599 words in compliance with the Local Rules. 10 Email: thomasburke@dwt.com

11 Counsel for Plaintiffs

14 The Parties having stipulated and agreed, it is hereby so ORDERED. 15 Dated this 30th day of November 2023. 16 A 17 Tana Lin United States District Judge 18

19 20 21 22 23 24

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

University of Washington v. United States Department of Homeland Security, (W.D. Wash. 2023).

University of Washington v. United States Department of Homeland Security (University of Washington v. United States Department of Homeland Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

King v. State Of California
784 F.2d 910 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)