University of Texas at Austin v. Joscelin Yeo

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 22, 2002
Docket03-02-00144-CV
StatusPublished

This text of University of Texas at Austin v. Joscelin Yeo (University of Texas at Austin v. Joscelin Yeo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
University of Texas at Austin v. Joscelin Yeo, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN




NO. 03-02-00144-CV
University of Texas, Appellant


v.



Joscelin Yeo, Appellee



FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 200TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. GN200916, HONORABLE PAUL DAVIS, JUDGE PRESIDING

PER CURIAM

The district court granted a temporary restraining order in favor of appellee Joscelin Yoe and has set a hearing on the temporary injunction for April 2, 2002. The appellant The University of Texas at Austin has filed a notice of appeal complaining about the district court's temporary restraining order. Generally, interlocutory orders are not appealable. However, in some instances, Texas statutes provide an appeal from certain interlocutory orders. (1) See, e.g., Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014 (West Supp. 2002); Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 171.098(a) (West Supp. 2002). No statutory provision provides that temporary restraining orders are appealable orders. Moreover, temporary restraining orders, unless extended, expire by operation of law after fourteen days. Tex. R. Civ. P. 680. Thus, we conclude that this temporary restraining order is not appealable. See Lesikar v. Rappeport, 899 S.W.2d 654, 655 (Tex. 1995); Ex Parte Tucci, 859 S.W.2d 1, 2 n.4 (Tex. 1993); Ohlhausen v. Thompson, 704 S.W.2d 434, 436 (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1986, no writ) (citing Arvol D. Hays Constr. Co. v. R & M Agency Corp., 471 S.W.2d 628, 629 (Tex. Civ. App.--Fort Worth 1971, writ ref'd n.r.e.)).

Because this Court is without jurisdiction, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 2, 42.3(a).



Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices Kidd and Onion*

Dismissed For Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: March 22, 2002

Do Not Publish



* Before John F. Onion, Jr., Presiding Judge (retired), Court of Criminal Appeals, sitting by assignment. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 74.003(b) (West 1998).

1.   For instance, temporary injunctions are subject to an interlocutory appeal. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(4) (West Supp. 2002).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lesikar v. Rappeport
899 S.W.2d 654 (Texas Supreme Court, 1995)
Arvol D. Hays Construction Co. v. R & M Agency Corp.
471 S.W.2d 628 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1971)
Ex Parte Tucci
859 S.W.2d 1 (Texas Supreme Court, 1993)
Ohlhausen v. Thompson
704 S.W.2d 434 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
University of Texas at Austin v. Joscelin Yeo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/university-of-texas-at-austin-v-joscelin-yeo-texapp-2002.