University of North Carolina v. State National Bank

92 N.C. 651
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 5, 1885·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Sjiith, C. J.

(after stating the facts). We have repeatedly ruled that under such circumstances, when a part of the issues or mat *652 ters in dispute are passed on, and others material to a disposition of the cause, left open, an appeal was premature and would not be entertained. The cases are numerous to this effect and we are content to refer to some of them. Hines v. Hines, 84 N. C., 122; Commissioners v. Satchwell, 88 N. C., 1; Jones v. Call, 89 N. C., 188; Grant v. Reese, 90 N. C., 3; Arrington v. Arrington, 91 N. C., 301.

In accordance with these adjudications the appeal must be dismissed, and it is so ordered. Let this be certified to the Superior Court of "Wake.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

University of North Carolina v. State National Bank, 92 N.C. 651 (N.C. 1885).

92 N.C. 651 (University of North Carolina v. State National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goode v. . Rogers
35 S.E. 185 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1900)
Blackwell v. . McCaine
11 S.E. 360 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1890)
Hilliard v. . Oram
11 S.E. 514 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1890)