University Medical Center, Inc. v. Blanchard

District Court of Appeal of Florida

University Medical Center, Inc. v. Blanchard

843 So. 2d 313, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4081, 2003 WL 1560152

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 27, 2003

DocketNos. 1D02-0848, 02-0851

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 843 So. 2d 313 (University Medical Center, Inc. v. Blanchard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

University Medical Center, Inc. v. Blanchard, 843 So. 2d 313, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4081, 2003 WL 1560152 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm as to all issues raised on appeal. Pursuant to our opinion in Lewis v. Bondy, 752 So.2d 1225 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), we affirm the trial court’s use of a multiplier in determining attorney’s fees under the offer of judgment statute; however, we note conflict with Allstate Ins. Co. v. Sarkis, 809 So.2d 6 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (en banc), review granted, 826 So.2d 992 (Fla.2002).

BOOTH, WOLF and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm as to all issues raised on appeal. Pursuant to our opinion in Lewis v. Bondy, 752 So.2d 1225 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), we affirm the trial court’s use of a multiplier in determining attorney’s fees under the offer of judgment statute; however, we note conflict with Allstate Ins. Co. v. Sarkis, 809 So.2d 6 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (en banc), review granted, 826 So.2d 992 (Fla.2002).

BOOTH, WOLF and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

843 So. 2d 313, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4081, 2003 WL 1560152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/university-medical-center-inc-v-blanchard-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack