University Garden Apartments, L.P. v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

284 A.D.2d 975, 726 N.Y.S.2d 901, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5972
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 8, 2001·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Supreme Court properly granted the cross motion of Nationwide for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint against it. Plaintiffs are strangers to the insurance policy issued to Dickerson, and they may not maintain a direct action against Nationwide to enforce Nationwide’s obligation under that policy unless a judgment against Dickerson is rendered and remains unsatisfied (see, Insurance Law § 3420 [a] [2]; [b] [2]; Abdalla v Yehia, 246 AD2d 373, 374; Hershberger v Schwartz, 198 AD2d 859, 860). We modify the order, however, by deleting the third ordering paragraph. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Fricano, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Green, J. P., Hayes, Hurlbutt, Scudder and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

University Garden Apartments, L.P. v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance, 284 A.D.2d 975, 726 N.Y.S.2d 901, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5972 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

284 A.D.2d 975 (University Garden Apartments, L.P. v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Northland Associates., Inc. v. Joseph Baldwin Constraction Co.
6 A.D.3d 1214 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Lang v. Hanover Insurance
309 A.D.2d 1123 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Vargas v. Boston Chicken, Inc.
269 F. Supp. 2d 92 (E.D. New York, 2003)