Universalist Convention v. Guest

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Universalist Convention v. Guest

171 S.E. 453, 47 Ga. App. 747, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 639

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 20, 1933

Docket23007

StatusPublished

This text of 171 S.E. 453 (Universalist Convention v. Guest) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Universalist Convention v. Guest, 171 S.E. 453, 47 Ga. App. 747, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 639 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Sutton, J.

In a suit on notes secured by a loan deed to certain realty, where the defendant answers pleading payment, and prays that the notes and the loan deed be cancelled, the action at law is converted into a proceeding seeking affirmative equitable relief; and where a verdict is obtained in favor of the defendant, recommending cancellation of the notes and the loan deed, and a decree is entered ordering the cancellation thereof, and the plaintiff moves for a new trial upon the general grounds, and the motion is overruled, and it excepts, the Supreme Court and not this court, has jurisdiction of the writ of error. Peebles v. Windham, 46 Ga. App. 285 (167 S. E. 550) ; s. c. 177 Ga. 741.

Transferred to the Supi-eme Court.

Jenloins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sutton, J.

In a suit on notes secured by a loan deed to certain realty, where the defendant answers pleading payment, and prays that the notes and the loan deed be cancelled, the action at law is converted into a proceeding seeking affirmative equitable relief; and where a verdict is obtained in favor of the defendant, recommending cancellation of the notes and the loan deed, and a decree is entered ordering the cancellation thereof, and the plaintiff moves for a new trial upon the general grounds, and the motion is overruled, and it excepts, the Supreme Court and not this court, has jurisdiction of the writ of error. Peebles v. Windham, 46 Ga. App. 285 (167 S. E. 550) ; s. c. 177 Ga. 741.

Transferred to the Supi-eme Court.

Jenloins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 S.E. 453, 47 Ga. App. 747, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/universalist-convention-v-guest-gactapp-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack