Universal X Rays, Corp., A/A/O Damaris Broche v. Infinity Auto Insurance Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 16, 2026·No. 3D2025-0886·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed July 16, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D25-0886 Lower Tribunal No. 22-10748-SP-05 ________________

Universal X Rays, Corp., a/a/o Damaris Broche, Appellant,

vs.

Infinity Auto Insurance Company, Appellee.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Miesha Darrough, Judge.

Alvarez, Feltman, Da Silva & Costa, P.L., and Paul B. Feltman; Robert J. Lee, P.A., and Robert J. Lee, for appellant.

Law Offices of Terry M. Torres & Associates, and Robert Phaneuf, for appellee.

Before, LINDSEY, GORDO and GOODEN JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Ottey v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 299 So. 3d 500, 501

(Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (“Our standard of review of an order granting summary

judgment is de novo.” (quoting White v. Ferco Motors Corp., 260 So. 3d 388,

390 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)); Betancourt v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 406 So. 3d

1011, 1013 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025) (“The court shall grant summary judgment if

the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact

and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” (quoting Fla. R.

Civ. P. 1.510(a))); Luckman v. Wills, 306 So. 3d 990, 993 n.2 (Fla. 3d DCA

2020) (“A trial court’s evidentiary ruling that excludes an affidavit is reviewed

for an abuse of discretion.”); State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Advanced

X-Ray Analysis, Inc., 368 So. 3d 1049, 1051 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023) (“A party

cannot evade the requirement to timely file based on a trial court’s

discretionary choice . . . . It is far-fetched to argue a trial court abused its

discretion by enforcing the plain language of a rule of civil procedure

promulgated to place practitioners and courts on notice of what is required.

These rules are not advisory and are meant to provide time limits to raise

arguments and present evidence in order to prevent gamesmanship, unfair

surprise, and prejudice.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Universal X Rays, Corp., A/A/O Damaris Broche v. Infinity Auto Insurance Company, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Universal X Rays, Corp., A/A/O Damaris Broche v. Infinity Auto Insurance Company (Universal X Rays, Corp., A/A/O Damaris Broche v. Infinity Auto Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

White v. Ferco Motors Corp.
260 So. 3d 388 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)