Universal Taximeter Cab Co. v. Blumenthal

143 N.Y.S. 1056
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 13, 1913
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 143 N.Y.S. 1056 (Universal Taximeter Cab Co. v. Blumenthal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Universal Taximeter Cab Co. v. Blumenthal, 143 N.Y.S. 1056 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

GUY, J.

This action was brought to recover for damages to plaintiff’s motor cab, caused by a collision' with a furniture Van belonging to defendant. Plaintiff made out a;good cause of action, but failed.to introduce proper proof of damage. The true measure of damage for loss of usable value of plaintiff’s machine wtiüld be the cost of hiring such a machine in the market for the period during which plaintiff was deprived of the use of his machine. In the absence of proof that such a machine could not be hired in the market at that time, the evidence of the profits derived by plaintiff from the use of his machine w.as incompetent, and its admission constituted reversible error.

The judgment must therefore be reversed, and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilson & Co. v. Sims
34 So. 2d 689 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1948)
Meyers v. Bradford
201 P. 471 (California Court of Appeal, 1921)
Perkins v. Brown
132 Tenn. 294 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1915)
Cook v. Packard Motor Car Co.
92 A. 413 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 N.Y.S. 1056, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/universal-taximeter-cab-co-v-blumenthal-nyappterm-1913.