Universal Prot. Serv. v. S.C.

381 P.3d 230, 208 Cal. Rptr. 3d 283
California Supreme Court·Decided September 21, 2016·No. S229442·Published

Opinion

Dismissed and remanded to CA 3. Review in the above-captioned matter is dismissed in light of this court's decision in Sandquist v. Lebo Automotive, Inc. (2016) 1 Cal.5th 233, 205 Cal.Rptr.3d 359, 376 P.3d 506. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.528(b).)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Universal Prot. Serv. v. S.C., 381 P.3d 230, 208 Cal. Rptr. 3d 283 (Cal. 2016).

381 P.3d 230 (Universal Prot. Serv. v. S.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sandquist v. Lebo Automotive, Inc.
376 P.3d 506 (California Supreme Court, 2016)