Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. Ron Hester Restorations, Inc. Through Assignment From William Horsley
This text of Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. Ron Hester Restorations, Inc. Through Assignment From William Horsley (Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. Ron Hester Restorations, Inc. Through Assignment From William Horsley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
Case No. 6D2023-3843 Lower Tribunal No. 2018CC-001148-0000-00 _____________________________
UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,
Appellant,
v.
RON HESTER RESTORATIONS, INC., through assignment from WILLIAM HORSLEY,
Appellee. _____________________________
Appeal from the County Court for Polk County. Kevin M. Kohl, Judge.
August 15, 2025
BROWNLEE, J.
Appellant Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company challenges a
final fees and costs judgment, arguing the use of a 1.25 contingency fee multiplier
is not supported by competent, substantial evidence. Because Appellant has only
furnished a transcript for the first day of a two-day evidentiary hearing, we must
affirm, as “we cannot conclude that the order ‘is not supported by the evidence or
by an alternative theory.’” See Bourbous v. Tropic Sun Props., LLC, 50 Fla. L.
Weekly D1309a, D1310 (Fla. 6th DCA June 13, 2025) (quoting Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979)); see also Loginov v.
Samoilova, 345 So. 3d 372, 375 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (“We further note [appellant]
only provided this Court a transcript from one day of the three-day bench trial. While
the transcript contains most of the expert witness’ testimony, to the extent the trial
court made factual findings on the two other days of the bench trial, we are
constrained to affirm absent a showing of reversible error.” (citing Applegate, 377
So. 2d at 1152)).
AFFIRMED.
STARGEL and MIZE, JJ., concur.
David A. Noel and Kara Rockenbach Link, of Link & Rockenbach, PA, West Palm Beach, for Appellant.
Nicholas A. Shannin, of Shannin Law Firm, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. Ron Hester Restorations, Inc. Through Assignment From William Horsley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/universal-property-casualty-insurance-company-v-ron-hester-restorations-fladistctapp-2025.