UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. REESE F. KING AND JANET A. KING
This text of UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. REESE F. KING AND JANET A. KING (UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. REESE F. KING AND JANET A. KING) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,
Petitioner,
v.
REESE F. KING and JANET A. KING,
Respondents.
No. 2D22-967
September 23, 2022
Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Polk County; James A. Yancey, Judge.
Andrew A. Labbe of Groelle & Salmon, P.A., Tampa, for Petitioner.
Mark A. Nation of The Nation Law Firm, Longwood, and Ashley McMahan of Morgan & Morgan, Orlando, for Respondents.
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed.
CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. REESE F. KING AND JANET A. KING, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/universal-property-casualty-insurance-company-v-reese-f-king-and-janet-fladistctapp-2022.