UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. REESE F. KING AND JANET A. KING

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 23, 2022·No. 22-0967·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

Petitioner,

v.

REESE F. KING and JANET A. KING,

Respondents.

No. 2D22-967

September 23, 2022

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Polk County; James A. Yancey, Judge.

Andrew A. Labbe of Groelle & Salmon, P.A., Tampa, for Petitioner.

Mark A. Nation of The Nation Law Firm, Longwood, and Ashley McMahan of Morgan & Morgan, Orlando, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed.

CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. REESE F. KING AND JANET A. KING, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. REESE F. KING AND JANET A. KING (UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. REESE F. KING AND JANET A. KING) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.