UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. GUILLERMO B. QUINTERO

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed January 12, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-373

Lower Tribunal No. 16-30377

________________

Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Appellant,

vs.

Guillermo B. Quintero, et al., Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jennifer D.

Bailey, Judge.

Russo Appellate Firm, P.A., and Paulo R. Lima, for appellant.

Giasi Law, P.A. and Melissa A. Giasi and Erin M. Berger (Tampa), for appellees.

Before EMAS, LOGUE and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Vargas v. Safepoint Ins. Co., No. 3D19-1656, at *2 (Fla.

3d DCA Jan. 12, 2022) (examining the “Concealment or Fraud” provision of a homeowner’s insurance policy and concluding that “the term ‘false statement’ in the post-loss context includes an element of intent to mislead”); Anchor Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Trif, 322 So. 3d 663, 675 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021) (concluding that, “in the post-loss context, the term ‘false statement’ in the ‘Concealment or Fraud’ exclusion [of a homeowner’s insurance policy] should be interpreted as including an element of intent”).