Universal Printing Co. v. U.S. Fire Insurance Co.
This text of 934 So. 2d 487 (Universal Printing Co. v. U.S. Fire Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse the trial court’s denial of Universal Printing Company’s motion for permission to file a third amended complaint as to counts I and II. Universal sought to assert that its insurer, U.S. Fire Insurance Company, waived its settlement defense. There is no “pertinent consideration” to support the court’s order denying Universal’s motion to amend. See Carib Ocean Shipping, Inc. v. Armas, 854 So.2d 234, 235-37 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), and cases cited therein.1 Therefore, the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to permit such amendment. Accordingly, we are compelled to vacate the summary judgments on those counts. In addition, because the court granted summary judgment on count III on the same basis as [488]*488counts I and II — breach of the cooperation clause, we vacate the judgment on that count.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
934 So. 2d 487, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17079, 2004 WL 2554876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/universal-printing-co-v-us-fire-insurance-co-fladistctapp-2004.