Universal Health Services of Nevada, Inc. v. Shalala

18 F.3d 954, 305 U.S. App. D.C. 194, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 23640, 1994 WL 47155
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedFebruary 9, 1994
Docket92-5379
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 18 F.3d 954 (Universal Health Services of Nevada, Inc. v. Shalala) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Universal Health Services of Nevada, Inc. v. Shalala, 18 F.3d 954, 305 U.S. App. D.C. 194, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 23640, 1994 WL 47155 (D.C. Cir. 1994).

Opinion

18 F.3d 954

305 U.S.App.D.C. 194

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES OF NEVADA, INC., doing business as
Valley Hospital Medical Center, wholly-owned and
operated by Universal Health Services,
Inc., Appellant,
v.
Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of the Department of Health and
Human Services, Appellee.

No. 92-5379.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Feb. 9, 1994.

Before: WALD, HENDERSON, and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This cause came to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and was briefed and argued by counsel. While the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion, they have been accorded full consideration by the Court. See D.C.Cir.R. 36(b).

The district court adopted the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Alan Kay. We affirm the district court's judgment substantially for the reasons contained in that Report and Recommendation. Cf. Newark Morning Ledger Co. v. United States, 113 S.Ct. 1670 (1993).

ORDERED and ADJUDGED, by this Court, that the judgment of the district court is hereby affirmed.

FURTHER ORDERED, by this Court, that the Clerk shall withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after the disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.R. 41(a).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lake Medical Center v. Shalala
89 F. Supp. 2d 83 (District of Columbia, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 F.3d 954, 305 U.S. App. D.C. 194, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 23640, 1994 WL 47155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/universal-health-services-of-nevada-inc-v-shalala-cadc-1994.