Universal Forest Products v. Ellenburg

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Universal Forest Products v. Ellenburg

627 So. 2d 400, 1993 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 349, 1993 WL 270891

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Universal Forest Products v. Ellenburg. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 510 →

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided July 23, 1993·No. 2910079·Published

Opinion

AFTER REMAND FROM SUPREME COURT

THIGPEN, Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been affirmed in part and reversed in part, and [401]*401the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion of April 16, 1993, 627 So.2d 398 (Ala.1993), the judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed regarding its award of benefits to Ellenburg based on the finding of a 50% permanent partial disability.

AFFIRMED ON REMAND.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and YATES, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AFTER REMAND FROM SUPREME COURT

THIGPEN, Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been affirmed in part and reversed in part, and [401]*401the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion of April 16, 1993, 627 So.2d 398 (Ala.1993), the judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed regarding its award of benefits to Ellenburg based on the finding of a 50% permanent partial disability.

AFFIRMED ON REMAND.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and YATES, J., concur.

Universal Forest Products v. Ellenburg, 627 So. 2d 400, 1993 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 349, 1993 WL 270891 (Ala. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

627 So. 2d 400 (Universal Forest Products v. Ellenburg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.