Universal Forest Products v. Ellenburg
This text of 627 So. 2d 400 (Universal Forest Products v. Ellenburg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
AFTER REMAND FROM SUPREME COURT
The prior judgment of this court has been affirmed in part and reversed in part, and [401]*401the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion of April 16, 1993, 627 So.2d 398 (Ala.1993), the judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed regarding its award of benefits to Ellenburg based on the finding of a 50% permanent partial disability.
AFFIRMED ON REMAND.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
627 So. 2d 400, 1993 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 349, 1993 WL 270891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/universal-forest-products-v-ellenburg-alacivapp-1993.