Universal Forest Products v. Ellenburg

627 So. 2d 400, 1993 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 349, 1993 WL 270891
CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama
DecidedJuly 23, 1993
Docket2910079
StatusPublished

This text of 627 So. 2d 400 (Universal Forest Products v. Ellenburg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Universal Forest Products v. Ellenburg, 627 So. 2d 400, 1993 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 349, 1993 WL 270891 (Ala. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

AFTER REMAND FROM SUPREME COURT

THIGPEN, Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been affirmed in part and reversed in part, and [401]*401the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion of April 16, 1993, 627 So.2d 398 (Ala.1993), the judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed regarding its award of benefits to Ellenburg based on the finding of a 50% permanent partial disability.

AFFIRMED ON REMAND.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and YATES, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
627 So. 2d 400, 1993 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 349, 1993 WL 270891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/universal-forest-products-v-ellenburg-alacivapp-1993.