Universal City Property Management v. Sevdinoglou
Opinions
We grant that portion of the petition for writ of certiorari that requests review of the trial court’s order compelling production of incident and accident reports. See Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., v. Nakutis, 435 So.2d 307 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), rev. denied, 446 So.2d 100 (Fla.1984); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.280(b)(2).
We deny that portion of the petition that seeks review of the order requiring produc[1063] tion of documents relating to plans, drawings, and blueprints of any changes, repairs or modifications of the exit area where the alleged accident occurred. See, First City Developments of Florida v. Hallmark of Hollywood Condominium Ass’n, Inc., 545 So.2d 502 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).
PETITION GRANTED IN PART.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
658 So. 2d 1062 (Universal City Property Management v. Sevdinoglou) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.