Universal City Property Management v. Sevdinoglou

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Universal City Property Management v. Sevdinoglou

658 So. 2d 1062, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6792, 1995 WL 370922

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 23, 1995

DocketNo. 95-650

StatusPublished

This text of 658 So. 2d 1062 (Universal City Property Management v. Sevdinoglou) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Universal City Property Management v. Sevdinoglou, 658 So. 2d 1062, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6792, 1995 WL 370922 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We grant that portion of the petition for writ of certiorari that requests review of the trial court’s order compelling production of incident and accident reports. See Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., v. Nakutis, 435 So.2d 307 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), rev. denied, 446 So.2d 100 (Fla.1984); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.280(b)(2).

We deny that portion of the petition that seeks review of the order requiring produc[1063]*1063tion of documents relating to plans, drawings, and blueprints of any changes, repairs or modifications of the exit area where the alleged accident occurred. See, First City Developments of Florida v. Hallmark of Hollywood Condominium Ass’n, Inc., 545 So.2d 502 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

PETITION GRANTED IN PART.

GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur. W. SHARP, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI