Universal Casualty Insurance Co. v. Rodriguez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Universal Casualty Insurance Co. v. Rodriguez

548 So. 2d 674, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1143, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2483, 1989 WL 47193

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 9, 1989·No. No. 89-34·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

LEVY, Judge.

In a negligence action, the defendant below appeals the trial court’s Order granting the plaintiff’s Motion to Set Aside the Or[675]*675der of Dismissal that had been entered by the court pursuant to Rule 1.420(e) of the Florida Rules of Civil Prodedure.

The plaintiff contends that the trial court’s Order setting aside the Order of Dismissal is a non-final Order and is, therefore, not appealable. We agree. Marsh & McLennan, Inc. vs. Aerolineas Nacionales Del Ecuador, 530 So.2d 971 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).

Accordingly, and pursuant to the above-cited authority, this appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LEVY, Judge.

In a negligence action, the defendant below appeals the trial court’s Order granting the plaintiff’s Motion to Set Aside the Or[675]*675der of Dismissal that had been entered by the court pursuant to Rule 1.420(e) of the Florida Rules of Civil Prodedure.

The plaintiff contends that the trial court’s Order setting aside the Order of Dismissal is a non-final Order and is, therefore, not appealable. We agree. Marsh & McLennan, Inc. vs. Aerolineas Nacionales Del Ecuador, 530 So.2d 971 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).

Accordingly, and pursuant to the above-cited authority, this appeal is dismissed.

Universal Casualty Insurance Co. v. Rodriguez, 548 So. 2d 674, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1143, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2483, 1989 WL 47193 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

548 So. 2d 674 (Universal Casualty Insurance Co. v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related