Universal Carloading & Distributing Co. v. Camden Fire Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Universal Carloading & Distributing Co. v. Camden Fire Insurance

247 A.D. 709

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 247 A.D. 709 (Universal Carloading & Distributing Co. v. Camden Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Universal Carloading & Distributing Co. v. Camden Fire Insurance, 247 A.D. 709 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Action on a policy of transportation insurance for a loss by fire. On January 18, 1933, plaintiff, a forwarder, shipped at Kansas City a quantity of goods on a truck owned and operated by Molander Brothers Freight Lines for delivery at Denver, Col. On January twentieth, while the truck and its contents were at Salina, Kan., era route to Denver, the goods were completely destroyed by fire, one of the risks insured against. The policy of insurance was issued by defendant to Molander Brothers Freight Lines with a rider making plaintiff an assured under the policy. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action on a policy of transportation insurance for a loss by fire. On January 18, 1933, plaintiff, a forwarder, shipped at Kansas City a quantity of goods on a truck owned and operated by Molander Brothers Freight Lines for delivery at Denver, Col. On January twentieth, while the truck and its contents were at Salina, Kan., era route to Denver, the goods were completely destroyed by fire, one of the risks insured against. The policy of insurance was issued by defendant to Molander Brothers Freight Lines with a rider making plaintiff an assured under the policy. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 A.D. 709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/universal-carloading-distributing-co-v-camden-fire-insurance-nyappdiv-1936.