Universal Building Specialties v. Apelquist

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Universal Building Specialties v. Apelquist

378 So. 2d 851, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15992

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 19, 1979

DocketNo. 78-1829

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 378 So. 2d 851 (Universal Building Specialties v. Apelquist) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Universal Building Specialties v. Apelquist, 378 So. 2d 851, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15992 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It is black letter law that a judgment of the trial court comes to the appellate court clothed with a presumption of validity. If, upon the pleadings and evidence considered by the trial judge sitting without a jury, “ . . . there is any theory or principle of law supporting the judgment, the appellate court is obliged to affirm.” Best Concrete Corporation v. Oswalt Engineering Service Corporation, 188 So.2d 587, 588 (Fla.2nd DCA, 1966).

We are unable to conclude on the record before us that the amended final judgment appealed from is unsupportable upon “any theory or principle of law,” and we therefore affirm.

AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY, C. J., HERSEY, J., and DAUKSCH, JAMES C., Jr. Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI