Universal Building Specialties v. Apelquist

378 So. 2d 851, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15992
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 19, 1979·No. No. 78-1829·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It is black letter law that a judgment of the trial court comes to the appellate court clothed with a presumption of validity. If, upon the pleadings and evidence considered by the trial judge sitting without a jury, “ . . . there is any theory or principle of law supporting the judgment, the appellate court is obliged to affirm.” Best Concrete Corporation v. Oswalt Engineering Service Corporation, 188 So.2d 587, 588 (Fla.2nd DCA, 1966).

We are unable to conclude on the record before us that the amended final judgment appealed from is unsupportable upon “any theory or principle of law,” and we therefore affirm.

AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY, C. J., HERSEY, J., and DAUKSCH, JAMES C., Jr. Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Universal Building Specialties v. Apelquist, 378 So. 2d 851, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15992 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

378 So. 2d 851 (Universal Building Specialties v. Apelquist) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lazenby v. Chas. P. Irwin Yacht Brokerage, Inc.
423 So. 2d 412 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Martin County v. J. & R. Trucking, Inc.
384 So. 2d 952 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)