Universal Aviation Equipment, Inc. v. Rosenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Universal Aviation Equipment, Inc. v. Rosenberg

18 A.D.2d 1081, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4062

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 1, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.2d 1081 (Universal Aviation Equipment, Inc. v. Rosenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Universal Aviation Equipment, Inc. v. Rosenberg, 18 A.D.2d 1081, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4062 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by former tenants to rescind an agreement of surrender of their lease, based upon the defendant landlord’s fraudulent misrepresentation, made prior to such surrender, that he would not accept plaintiffs’ proposed assignee as a successor tenant, and for other relief, the plaintiffs appeal: (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered August 22, 1962 upon the decision of the court after a non-jury trial, dismissing the amended complaint; and (2) from an order of said [1082]*1082court, entered November 27, 1962, which denied their motion for a new trial on the ground, inter alia, of newly discovered evidence. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion there was sufficient evidence to support the findings made by the Trial Judge. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by former tenants to rescind an agreement of surrender of their lease, based upon the defendant landlord’s fraudulent misrepresentation, made prior to such surrender, that he would not accept plaintiffs’ proposed assignee as a successor tenant, and for other relief, the plaintiffs appeal: (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered August 22, 1962 upon the decision of the court after a non-jury trial, dismissing the amended complaint; and (2) from an order of said [1082]*1082court, entered November 27, 1962, which denied their motion for a new trial on the ground, inter alia, of newly discovered evidence. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion there was sufficient evidence to support the findings made by the Trial Judge. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 1081, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4062, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/universal-aviation-equipment-inc-v-rosenberg-nyappdiv-1963.