Universal American Realty Corp. v. Dade County

Supreme Court of Florida

Universal American Realty Corp. v. Dade County

232 So. 2d 16, 1970 Fla. LEXIS 2822

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 28, 1970·No. No. 38801·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

These consolidated cases concern the rate of interest to be applied to delinquent tax payments where the Chancellor determines that a tax assessment has been challenged in good faith. The factual circumstances and statutory matter involved are given in the District Court’s consolidated opinion in this cause, 227 So.2d 317 (3rd D.C.A. Fla.1969). That Court has certified its opinion as being one of great public interest.

The issues raised here are adequately treated and decided in this Court’s opinion in Adler Built Industries v. Metropolitan [17]*17Dade County, Fla., 231 So.2d 197. Therefore on authority of this Court’s decision in Adler Built we hereby reverse that portion of the District Court’s decision regarding the proper rate of interest to be applied. These cases are remanded for further treatment not inconsistent with this opinion.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., ROBERTS, DREW and CARLTON, JJ., and VANN, Circuit Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

These consolidated cases concern the rate of interest to be applied to delinquent tax payments where the Chancellor determines that a tax assessment has been challenged in good faith. The factual circumstances and statutory matter involved are given in the District Court’s consolidated opinion in this cause, 227 So.2d 317 (3rd D.C.A. Fla.1969). That Court has certified its opinion as being one of great public interest.

The issues raised here are adequately treated and decided in this Court’s opinion in Adler Built Industries v. Metropolitan [17]*17Dade County, Fla., 231 So.2d 197. Therefore on authority of this Court’s decision in Adler Built we hereby reverse that portion of the District Court’s decision regarding the proper rate of interest to be applied. These cases are remanded for further treatment not inconsistent with this opinion.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., ROBERTS, DREW and CARLTON, JJ., and VANN, Circuit Judge, concur.

Universal American Realty Corp. v. Dade County, 232 So. 2d 16, 1970 Fla. LEXIS 2822 (Fla. 1970).

Pincite

232 So. 2d 16 (Universal American Realty Corp. v. Dade County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related