Unitron Import Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Unitron Import Corp. v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 1053

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJune 26, 1968

DocketNo. P68/287; protests 63/6721, etc. (Los Angeles)

StatusPublished

This text of 60 Cust. Ct. 1053 (Unitron Import Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Unitron Import Corp. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 1053 (cusc 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of wooden doors similar in all material respects to those the subject of B. A. McKenzie & Co., Inc. v. United States (58 Cust. Ct. 460, C.D. 3020) and that the items of merchandise marked “B” consist of folding doers similar in all material respects to those the subject of Gitkin Co. v. United States (58 Cust. Ct. 383, C.D. 2997), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of wooden doors similar in all material respects to those the subject of B. A. McKenzie & Co., Inc. v. United States (58 Cust. Ct. 460, C.D. 3020) and that the items of merchandise marked “B” consist of folding doers similar in all material respects to those the subject of Gitkin Co. v. United States (58 Cust. Ct. 383, C.D. 2997), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 Cust. Ct. 1053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/unitron-import-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack