Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. Swifteckrich, Inc. Dba Conagra Refrigerated Foods

543 U.S. 1186, 161 L. Ed. 2d 189, 125 S. Ct. 1396, 73 U.S.L.W. 3513, 2005 U.S. LEXIS 2083, 2005 WL 443881
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 28, 2005
Docket04-597
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 543 U.S. 1186 (Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. Swifteckrich, Inc. Dba Conagra Refrigerated Foods) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. Swifteckrich, Inc. Dba Conagra Refrigerated Foods, 543 U.S. 1186, 161 L. Ed. 2d 189, 125 S. Ct. 1396, 73 U.S.L.W. 3513, 2005 U.S. LEXIS 2083, 2005 WL 443881 (2005).

Opinion

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: “Whether, and to what extent, a court of appeals may review the sufficiency of evidence supporting a civil jury verdict where the party requesting review made a motion for judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure before submission of the case to the jury, but neither renewed that motion under Rule 50(b) after the jury’s verdict, nor moved for a new trial under Rule 59?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arthur W. Fuesting v. Zimmer, Inc.
448 F.3d 936 (Seventh Circuit, 2006)
Smith v. District of Columbia
413 F.3d 86 (D.C. Circuit, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
543 U.S. 1186, 161 L. Ed. 2d 189, 125 S. Ct. 1396, 73 U.S.L.W. 3513, 2005 U.S. LEXIS 2083, 2005 WL 443881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/unitherm-food-systems-inc-v-swifteckrich-inc-dba-conagra-refrigerated-scotus-2005.