UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company v. Xavier Becerra (ORDER)

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedNovember 1, 2021
Docket18-5326
StatusPublished

This text of UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company v. Xavier Becerra (ORDER) (UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company v. Xavier Becerra (ORDER)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company v. Xavier Becerra (ORDER), (D.C. Cir. 2021).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________

No. 18-5326 September Term, 2021 1:16-cv-00157-RMC Filed On: November 1, 2021 UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company, et al.,

Appellees

v.

Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al.,

Appellants

BEFORE: Rogers, Pillard, and Walker, Circuit Judges

ORDER

Upon consideration of appellees’ petition for panel rehearing filed September 27, 2021, and the response thereto, it is

ORDERED that the petition be denied. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the opinion issued August 13, 2021, be amended as follows:

(1) Slip Op., p. 7, lines 1-5: Delete: “We therefore reverse the district court’s grant of summary judgment to UnitedHealth and its resulting vacatur of the Overpayment Rule and remand for the district court to enter judgment in favor of CMS.” and

Insert in lieu thereof: “We therefore reverse the judgment of the district court vacating the Overpayment Rule and remand this case with orders to enter judgment in favor of Appellants, except with respect to the Overpayment Rule’s definition of ‘identified.’”

(2) Slip Op., p. 49, lines 5-7: Delete: “We accordingly reverse the judgment of the district court and remand this case with orders to enter judgment in favor of Appellants.” and

Insert in lieu thereof: “We accordingly reverse the judgment of the district court vacating the Overpayment Rule and remand this case with orders to enter judgment in favor of Appellants, except with respect to the Overpayment Rule’s definition of ‘identified.’” United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________

No. 18-5326 September Term, 2021

The Clerk is directed to issue the amended opinion and to amend the judgment issued August 13, 2021. The Clerk is further directed to issue the mandate forthwith.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk

BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Deputy Clerk

Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company v. Xavier Becerra (ORDER), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/unitedhealthcare-insurance-company-v-xavier-becerra-order-cadc-2021.