United Virginia Bank v. First & Merchants Nat. Bank

2 Va. Cir. 438, 1975 Va. Cir. LEXIS 8
Richmond County Circuit Court·Decided June 18, 1975·No. Case No. 6047·Published

Opinion

By JUDGE RICHARD L. WILLIAMS

After further consideration of this matter, I have concluded that the defendant's motion to dismiss for improper transfer puts this court in a position of having to exercise appellate jurisdiction over the Corporation Court of the City of Alexandria (now Circuit Court), an authority which we do not have.

Under § 8-157(a) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, this action was transferred to our court by Judge Wright after proper notice and a hearing. As I read subsection (a), the receiving judge has no authority to review the action of the transferring judge where the transfer is inter-circuit. The reverse seems to be true under subsection (b) where the transfer is intra-circuit. While the statute is titled removal, in application it seems to effect a transfer. Such a result is at least partially consistent with a definition of remove "in law" to transfer, as a cause, from one court to another by appeal or by change of venue.

For the above reason, the motion to dismiss for improper transfer is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United Virginia Bank v. First & Merchants Nat. Bank, 2 Va. Cir. 438, 1975 Va. Cir. LEXIS 8 (Va. Super. Ct. 1975).

2 Va. Cir. 438 (United Virginia Bank v. First & Merchants Nat. Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.