United v. Davis & Davis

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 7, 2015·No. 14-2703·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed January 7, 2015.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D14-2703

Lower Tribunal No. 13-5046

United Automobile Insurance Company, Petitioner,

vs.

Darwin Anthony Davis and Alicia Davis, Respondent.

A Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jerald Bagley, Judge.

Cole, Scott, & Kissane and Thomas E. Scott and Scott A. Cole and Daniel M. Schwarz, for petitioner.

Ver Ploeg & Lumpkin and Stephen A. Marino, Jr. and Rochelle N.

Wimbush, for respondent.

Before SUAREZ, SALTER, and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

United Automobile Insurance Company petitions for a Writ of Certiorari to

quash the Circuit Court’s October 31, 2014, Order on Defendant’s Objections to Plaintiff’s Second Request for Production. We grant the Petition.

As indicated in Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. v. Doe, 44 So. 3d 230, 234 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010), Respondents are not entitled to financial information until the trial court determines whether they have properly stated a claim for punitive damages. No such determination has been made in this case. Indeed, no claim for punitive damages has even been filed. In addition, Petitioner’s financial information is not relevant to any disputed issues raised by any other claim made by Respondents in their Complaint and is therefore not discoverable at this time.

Petition granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United v. Davis & Davis, (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

United v. Davis & Davis (United v. Davis & Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. v. Doe
44 So. 3d 230 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)