United v. Davis & Davis
This text of United v. Davis & Davis (United v. Davis & Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed January 7, 2015. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D14-2703 Lower Tribunal No. 13-5046 ________________
United Automobile Insurance Company, Petitioner,
vs.
Darwin Anthony Davis and Alicia Davis, Respondent.
A Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jerald Bagley, Judge.
Cole, Scott, & Kissane and Thomas E. Scott and Scott A. Cole and Daniel M. Schwarz, for petitioner.
Ver Ploeg & Lumpkin and Stephen A. Marino, Jr. and Rochelle N. Wimbush, for respondent.
Before SUAREZ, SALTER, and SCALES, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
United Automobile Insurance Company petitions for a Writ of Certiorari to quash the Circuit Court’s October 31, 2014, Order on Defendant’s Objections to
Plaintiff’s Second Request for Production. We grant the Petition.
As indicated in Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. v. Doe, 44 So. 3d 230, 234
(Fla. 3d DCA 2010), Respondents are not entitled to financial information until the
trial court determines whether they have properly stated a claim for punitive
damages. No such determination has been made in this case. Indeed, no claim for
punitive damages has even been filed. In addition, Petitioner’s financial
information is not relevant to any disputed issues raised by any other claim made
by Respondents in their Complaint and is therefore not discoverable at this time.
Petition granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United v. Davis & Davis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-v-davis-davis-fladistctapp-2015.