United Telephone Co. v. Logan County Farmers Telephone Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

United Telephone Co. v. Logan County Farmers Telephone Co.

91 Ohio St. (N.S.) 398

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 8, 1914

DocketNo. 14595

StatusPublished

This text of 91 Ohio St. (N.S.) 398 (United Telephone Co. v. Logan County Farmers Telephone Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United Telephone Co. v. Logan County Farmers Telephone Co., 91 Ohio St. (N.S.) 398 (Ohio 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed.

See journal entry.

It appearing that this cause was submitted to the court of appeals on the pleadings and the evidence including an agreed statement of facts and that no bill of exceptions was taken on the hear[399]*399ing of said cause nor was the agreed statement of facts brought into the record in accordance with the rule announced in Goyert v. Eicher, 70 Ohio St., 30, and that the facts presumably established to the satisfaction of the court of appeals in support of its judgment are not in this court for review, it is ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the court of appeals be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Donahue and Newman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed.

See journal entry.

It appearing that this cause was submitted to the court of appeals on the pleadings and the evidence including an agreed statement of facts and that no bill of exceptions was taken on the hear[399]*399ing of said cause nor was the agreed statement of facts brought into the record in accordance with the rule announced in Goyert v. Eicher, 70 Ohio St., 30, and that the facts presumably established to the satisfaction of the court of appeals in support of its judgment are not in this court for review, it is ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the court of appeals be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Donahue and Newman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 Ohio St. (N.S.) 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-telephone-co-v-logan-county-farmers-telephone-co-ohio-1914.