United Supply Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
This text of 123 S.E. 907 (United Supply Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. An indemnity bond in favor of a public board or body, as the board of education of McIntosh county, executed by one having a contract with the obligee for the erection of a school building, as principal, and by another as surety, conditioned for the faithful performance by the principal of the contract, which bond upon its face indemnifies the said board of education of McIntosh county only, and does not by its terms purport to be for the use of any person “doing work or furnishing skill, tools, machinery or materials under or for the purpose of such contract,” and which nowhere expressly purports to be tlie statutory bond required of a contractor for the doing of public work, as provided by the act approved August 19, 1916 (Ga. L.' 1916, p. 94), is not the statutory bond required of contractors for the benefit of such last-named persons under that act. American Surety Co. v. Small Quarries Co., 157 Ga. 33 (120 S. E. 617).
2. The petition in a suit against the surety by one furnishing materials for the erection of the school building for the public board therein referred to was properly dismissed on demurrer.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
123 S.E. 907, 32 Ga. App. 472, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-supply-co-v-united-states-fidelity-guaranty-co-gactapp-1924.