United States v. Ziadeh

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7185

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

JOSEPH ZIADEH,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:02-cr-00273-RLW-1)

Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 2, 2010

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Ziadeh, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Joseph Ziadeh appeals the district court’s order

denying his motions for a “rule to show cause why the respondent

The U.S. Government should not be held in contempt for its

failure to comply with the Court’s Final Restitution Order

entered on June 10, 2003,” and a motion for a “stay of execution

of any action related to the Final Restitution Order in the

caption [sic] case.” We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Ziadeh, No. 3:02-cr-

00273-RLW-1 (E.D. Va. June 11, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED