United States v. Zhukov

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Zhukov

622 F. App'x 886

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided November 12, 2015·No. No. 14-15527·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

John D. Carson, appointed counsel for Viacheslav Zhukov, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of [887] the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, Zhukov’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED, and Zhukov’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED AS MOOT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

John D. Carson, appointed counsel for Viacheslav Zhukov, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of [887] the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, Zhukov’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED, and Zhukov’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED AS MOOT.

United States v. Zhukov, 622 F. App'x 886 (11th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

622 F. App'x 886 (United States v. Zhukov) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related